Welcome back to the weekend everyone. Special prosecutor nathan wade has officially stepped down from the Georgia Election interference case. His resignation coming hours after judge scott mcafee found there was no actual conflict stemming from nathan wades relationship with fani willis and the prosecution of trump and his codefendants could continue as long as either nathan wade or fani willis resigned. Joining us to discuss it all is our friend, katie phang, attorney and host of the Katie Phang Show right here on msnbc and our other friend, justice and Legal Affairs analyst, Anthony Coley. Coley is a former Senior Advisor to attorney general merrick garland. Anthony coley wrote a piece for msnbc. Com talking and has tweets. That without sufficient evidence that the District Attorney and the prosecution, you talk about willis making a strong argument for why she said stay on the case against trump but she needs to remove her team, the attorney from whom she had a personal relationship
Rocket blasts off to new heights. Now the question is, where did it go . Our nbc reporters are following all of the latest developments. We begin in florida, where theyre in court, and the judge just made things interesting. Back in session after the lunch break. I understand that judge cannon is showing some skepticism. About what . Reporter thats correct, chris. Its always perilous to trying to interpret judge cannon. She has a habit of asking tough questions on both sides, but it was pretty clear shes baulks at the argument that the president ial acts means this case should be thrown out. She replied, its difficult to see how this gets you to the dismissal of an indictment. She added that this line of argument cements better suited in trial or during jury instructions, which is a point that some of our legal experts have made. This question that he decreed that some of these documents were personal, thats a fact question that should be decided at trial. Even though theres no evidenc
Discussion with god, why are they only attacking one or in reference to mr. To mr. Wade . And then she goes on. To say, god isnt it them playing the race card when they only question one. Now, if she had been truthful with that congregation, truthful with the community, she wouldve said i had a relationship with him good, bad, forgive me. Whatever thats what she should have said. But she chose to deflect and say the them the reference to them and the others and they saw obviously a reference to that motion filed by him by ms merchants. They choose to go after the black man and she then goes on again deflecting away and deflecting to the what i call the third rail in american society, choosing somebody on the other side of being a racist so and so is a racist. Theyre racist she was the one playing the race card in a way to try to deflect from her own conduct she goes on to say in discussions with the lord, god, is that is it that some some will never see a black man is qualified, no mat
And then she goes on to say, god, isnt it them playing the race card when they only question one. Now, if she had been truthful with that congregation, truthful with the community, she would have said, i had a relationship with him. Good, bad, forgive me, whatever, thats what she should have said. But she chose to deflect and say them, the reference to them and the others and they. Its obviously a reference to the motion filed by ms. Merchan. They choose to go after the black man. And she then goes on, again, deflecting away, and deflecting to the what i call the third rail in american society. Accusing somebody on the other side of being a racist. So and so is a racist. Theyre racist. She was the one playing the race card in a way to deflect from her own conduct. She goes on to say in her discussions with the lord. God, is it that some will never see a black man as qualified no matter his achievements, again, the deflection. What is she saying . The listener is not necessarily in that
They only attacking one in reference to mr. Wade. And then she goes on to say, god, is it them playing the racecar where they only question one . No, if she had been truthful with the congregation, truthful with the community she would have said i had a relationship with him. Good, bad, forgive me, whatever. That is what she should have said. But she chose to deflect and say them, the reference to them and the others and they. It is obviously a reference to the motion filed by Miss Merchant. They choose to go after the black man and she then goes on. Again, deflecting away. And deflecting to the what i call the third rail, the american society. Accusing somebody on the other side of being a racist. So and so is a racist. They are racist. She was the one playing the race card in a way to try to deflect from her own conduct. She goes on to say and her discussions with the lord, god, is that is it that some will never see a black man as qualified no matter his achievements . Again, the de