Debate over masks on children. masks don t appear to work. they don t appear to protect children. we do know they hurt children profoundly. so at this point the only debate left as the judge pointed dot there s not a debatn over science. it s a debate about power. and here the parameters who s i in charge of your children? is it you the parent or is it the teachers union who runs your country? istu you the voters or is it unelected bureaucrats? are they really in chargear? so to be clear, this isn t really about masks. those are the questionsnshe q we debating at this point. janet davis is already d made ue her mind about these questions. davidson is an assistant principal at an elementary schoolnt in loudoun county, virginia. listen here as she threatens too have children arrested if they dare to show up to class without a mask and you right your children will be held in an in school restriction and situation here at school.tu it is important that i point out to you it s statede in th
Is at stake that is important. but you don t want to throwhe b the baby out with the bath water. having been on the committee there were not enough resources to independently oversee this. having the capacity to do that is important and making surethe the court can doco that is importantjo and whether you call them an advocate is not more beurocracy, but it is standing in the rights of the americans m to make sure the appropriateate balance is struck. i like to say this and i will say it again.ag i voted against the patriot rea act because i read it. most members of congress did not.they they had 12 hours of hearings and then at the end they swapped the bill out. they had the draw cone yen power to reach into people s lives.have we have let the nsa redefine who we arere as americans and that is not acceptable. there is an interesting split in the debatn:e here. on one side you have no big deal and you have people like congressman i don t think it is not no cn big deal.