Livelihood depends on President Trumps destruction referring to cohen so that was all well in the courtroom. But then after court, when trump walked out and you could speak to the public, he said this about cohen what are they going to look at all the lives that gone . Good in the last row . He that joint line so he got caught lying pure lime well, im Insider Cohen firing back hey, Von Expletive in pants, your attacks of me, stink of desperation. We are all hoping that you take the stand in your defense. Lets public spat between a key witness and the defendant is remarkable in a court. And trump, of course, is under a gag order forbidden to speak about any witnesses in the trial. But this public brawl breaking out just hours before trump is back in court facetoface with the judge, juan merchan for hearing on gag order violations. He faces fines and of course, violations could ultimately put them in jail. So this is really serious stuff. And it comes as witnesses are already taking the
come ti vesti? – madame con capezzoli disegnati dalle perline e trasparenze killer - annalisa... dagospia.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dagospia.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Federal bureau of investigation. both political parties. not just republicans but we saw hillary clinton supporters coming out and saying comey was doing it for political reasons. everything we know about comey is he is not necessarily political. we may be a republican but his tenure at the fbi hasn t been one of police he made an err. but it is dangerous. he is a former deputy attorney general, now the fbi director. until now, he s had a pretty good reputation. right. you ve seen the politicization. democrats have been a little more critical. today, republicans are coming back and being critical. i agree with david though, that what governor pence said is dangerous for the reasons you stated. it is not just saying that, as a matter of politics, we want to focus on, as jason miller did, the ongoing investigation about
Opportunity in 2009 to stop it and we didn t. stay on topic here. if we don t make the deal, they get the nuke. if we don t go in and militarily make sure they don t. so you are basically saying there would be war? there could be. but the better thing is to cut them off economically. you can believe there is no investigation into the planned parenthood at this point? no, i can t. given what we have seen on these videos and the history, there absolutely should be. there is enough here to investigate, let s get the facts as you said in your opening. let s get the facts, let s see where they lead and let s move on this because we re talking about some things that are highly offensive to most of the people in america and if, as alleged on the video, they are against the law. now, there obviously is a political component here because the president of the united states is a big planned parenthood supporter. right? yes, sir. everybody knows that. he has made it clear. is
Though, constitutionally bound to enforce the law and so is nancy pelosi. he took an oath as you said and i took the same kind of oath. you said i swear to enforce the laws. not the laws i like or the laws i agree with you about the laws. and this president has not done that and this attorney general in her first real challenge has to show everybody is she going to be the chief federal law enforcement officer of this country or is she going to play politics? but, can she go against her boss, the president of the united states? i absolutely think she can. as attorney general we have seen that happen in the past. we have seen attorney generals resign. nixon era. why should we expect the same type of ethical conduct and righteousness from the current attorney general? now, we are not convicting planned parenthood here. we are just saying we need to know the facts because the taxpayers are funding. do you believe the taxpayers should spend money on planned parenthood? no, i d