this isn t about one person. this isn t about the secretary. it s about the entire system underneath it. mr. president, we need urgency. we need you to roll up our sleeves and get into these hospitals! we ll talk with derek bennett of iraq and afghanistan s veterans of america. and va wlis wihising blower mar moxness and what they learn about through the media. when was the president first made aware of these problems? i think we learned about them through the reports. what does this say about president obama s leadership? our sunday panel weighs in. and russia vows to respect the outcome of today s presidential election in ukraine despite deadly attacks by pro russian rebels. we ll have a live report from the region and senator kelly ayacht joins us from kiev. it s a fox news sunday exclusive. plus, our power player of the week. honoring our nation s veterans with a proper military farewell. no amount of money could ever buy the feeling that i get from the family
then the federal government asked them to be person when the bp oil spill happened so he led two crisis in new orleans. he is a rough and tumble kind of guy. he was arrested twice as an adult and got into fights. he learned because you can be a leader n one domain doesn t mean you will be in another. but he worked well for the coast guard. they loved him. he taught me when you are leading you cannot spend a lot of time in the regret locker. you have to move on. every person we interviewed experienced significant failure at one point time. we learn more about who we are in moments of failure than success. but the difference between these folks is they have grip and persistance and bounce back with are willing to keep trying. when i studied the whitehouse fell fellowship i was stunned how many were rejected the first time. a bunch of hands. we will start here. recent whitehouse fellow. how overtime has leadership changed when you see like 50 years is two generations. i thin
yet you have the government which is organized and barney you can also comment on this but as i understand it the start way this is not something that came from the outside that the westerners said oh this kind of government would be benefiting that historic way centralized and particularly the idea of appointments, but that is now she s is an anthropologist and described the prerogative of the afghan movement to decide who will govern. and he was writing about the afghan government 40 years ago. that s right from the historical perspective. so on the one hand it doesn t it looks like it doesn t match and i m just beginning a new project about this trying to understand the difference logic by which karzai appointed all kinds of entered governments that it affords the central government a certain amount of influence. for this kind of informal politics. going forward there are number of political players in afghanistan who believe that there should be serious decentrali
pakistan and afghanistan is also at the event. this is an hour and 40 minutes. it is a pleasure to be back here at columbia particularly in this room where i might mention 17 years ago in january of 1997 i chaired a meeting by the then dean who is president of cairo now, a meeting where he had a delegation with the taliban who came into the united states. this is a delegation that came to new york about 3-4 months after taking control of kabul. i might mention the people who were there the delegation was led by the person who was later their foreign minister and i saw him in kabul. he is a reconciled member. and he is currently a member of the afghan high peace counsel in kabul and another one who was the minister of refuge s and was assassinated after returning from a meeting in dubia strike to start a peace meeting. and their interrupter for the event is likely to be in the next cabinet. so this is a historic room. i met you first at the international association servi
hispanic in the agreement when these men were appointed to the various positions i think that he was initially the head of the military figure before becoming a civilian and becoming the governor. he didn t care particularly about what the formal appointment was. he was the governor in charge of the security forces and both of them of course exercised authority and formally over the several provinces not just of the colleges thatothe colleges e supposedly the governors of. nonetheless, they didn t behave as people feared that if you did not have a renewal of the civil war of course there was plenty of economic activity accompanied by their illicit activity into the line between the two things is often quite difficult to discern especially i should add in the view of the fact that the main economic activity in both of these areas was the u.s. war effort. maybe not always thought of as economic activity that produced him to distribute it more money than anything else including