To this activity that is a source of new revenue for the city as well as enforcement itself. Now our proposal the genesis of the legislation the underlying value of the legislation to address the citys affordability crisis how can we live in our city of 7 by 7 miles it addresses it in two receptors first of all, we know that the status quo of what we see with sharing housing is pushing san franciscans out of your city weve seen instances of landowner ellis act the full building for rental i want to agree with the City Attorney those are situations that need to be pursued under the law. But on the other hand, i note we know there are xrirg tenant that have entered into multiple units and they lease out other units for a bed peoples 3 and breakfast those are not doing activity i that support that will establish an enforcement structure if youre using a shareable housing to allow housing to be used arent year as Vacation Rentals or bedandbreakfast i could be fined thats one of the portion
First of all, we know that the status quo of what we see with sharing housing is pushing san franciscans out of your city weve seen instances of landowner ellis act the full building for rental i want to agree with the City Attorney those are situations that need to be pursued under the law. But on the other hand, i note we know there are xrirg tenant that have entered into multiple units and they lease out other units for a bed peoples 3 and breakfast those are not doing activity i that support that will establish an enforcement structure if youre using a shareable housing to allow housing to be used arent year as Vacation Rentals or bedandbreakfast i could be fined thats one of the portion. On the other hand, its any prospective and i think its shared by as follows that home sharing has allowed struggling residents to live in our expensive city whether it be seniors or students out of town or whether it be working families that are visiting families whether workers traveling foyer th
Agency commissioner, i share i appreciate our service so i thinks your responsibility is to protect the interests of the San Francisco sir, your time is up. Thank you. Thank you good afternoon commissioners my name is george. Im representing the midtown Homeowners Association and i am against david carmen chus legislation we feel our neighborhood is 18 to nine hundred homes are rh1 was founded in 1950 as a Residential One unit. What happens is we take care of our neighborhood through our Homeowners Association and we feel that this completely vicinities and destroys our Homeowners Association it overrides our cc rs. I think the biggest problem is we all moving move through to have a commercial neighborhood and following it we now whats happening is our neighborhood going to become commercialized this causes concern among the neighborhood. We really building in terry of our neighborhood and feel its a situation where if it becomes commercialized we could not control what happens to the
Value of the legislation to address the citys affordability crisis how can we live in our city of 7 by 7 miles it addresses it in two receptors first of all, we know that the status quo of what we see with sharing housing is pushing san franciscans out of your city weve seen instances of landowner ellis act the full building for rental i want to agree with the City Attorney those are situations that need to be pursued under the law. But on the other hand, i note we know there are xrirg tenant that have entered into multiple units and they lease out other units for a bed peoples 3 and breakfast those are not doing activity i that support that will establish an enforcement structure if youre using a shareable housing to allow housing to be used arent year as Vacation Rentals or bedandbreakfast i could be fined thats one of the portion. On the other hand, its any prospective and i think its shared by as follows that home sharing has allowed struggling residents to live in our expensive ci