good morning. welcome to morning joe on this monday, july 1st. this morning, we are waking up to a sea of headlines and opinion pieces from major news organizations, former party leaders, and very loud whispers, mostly behind the scenes, from present leading democrats who say it is over. here s a taste of the global call for president joe biden to get out of the race. the new york times editorial board says biden is not the man he was four years ago, calling his candidacy, quote, a reckless gamble. editors at georgia s largest newspaper, the atlanta journal constitution, echoed that take, demanding the president pass the torch. quote, biden deserves a better exit from public life than the one he endured when he shuffled off the stage on thursday night. then there were the headlines, sneering, mocking, jeering all at once. this was the performance that has gotten us to this point. we had a thousand trillionaires in america. i mean billionaires. what s happening? they r
kind, mental relief. not everyone is able to breathe easier as questions over whether americans who needed help, the most will get it. we ll already know that black americans are not getting the vaccine in a way that s proportionate. coming up, we ll talk to a doctor who says it s not just fear widening that gap but lack of communities having access that they never had it to begin with. i also get into a gap in priorities in washington because even with his response getting high marks from the american people is already clear that just as when biden was last in the white house, republicans will have no qualms about extending american suffering if it means shortening a democrat s reach. double that if he s black or at least black adjacent. but this time they have two obsessions, biden and our former president, who is in no legal position to lead them to electoral redemption right now and may not ever be. as the tentacles of various civil and criminal investigations tighten aro
The supreme court intends to take the case and to issue a single ruling. dave, whether it s the superior court or supreme court, backlash might need to be considered, some might say. is the supreme court justice or a superior court judge looking at backlash or are they supposed to? what s the job? if you discipline a child forgetting into a fight, do you go, hmm, maybe i won t discipline the child because other kids might get mad. is the job to worry about backlash, or is the job to decide whether or not president donald trump, former president trump, engaged in insurrection and, therefore, is not qualified to be on the ballot? good morning, mika. it s not supposed to be considered the political backlash. that s why you give federal judges and justices lifetime
Separations of power and the checks and balances to say, yes, we are a democracy but are a nation of laws. we re about to see donald trump wrap himself in the cloak of defender of the democracy. and that s why time is of the essence. former u.s. attorney and former msnbc contributor chuck rosenberg and dave aaronberg. chuck, i ll start with you. the lawyers have asked the superior court in maine to vacate, saying it s undemocratic, she doesn t have standing to do this on her own. how do you see this playing out? if you just want to focus on maine, willie, under maine law,
Don t have that determines by an appellate court or supreme court. do we get this done enabling the trial to go forward. i think it s certainly in danger. dave, charlie has been talking about the january the 6th case and the chances for that coming to trial and being resolved. can you give us some kind of crystal ball gaze forward where we re going to be on all of these legal cases november 5th, election day of 2024? do you think any of them will have will any of them have started, concluded, resulted in any kind of sentencing? what sort of stage do you think any of them will be at? katty, i think two of the criminal cases could go before the election. the stormy daniels hush money