records show a profound breach of a defendant s word that he would protect information and the security of the united states. the judge in this case david hennessey also went on to talk about who this defendant had hurt by releasing those troves of classified documents online saying who did he put at risk? he could make a list as long as a phone book. soldiers, medical personnel, ukrainian personnel, ukrainian soldiers. we don t know how many people he put at risk. he went on to say that the government has said if you disclose this information, you put the united states at serious risk and the defendant s response was, i don t give a expletive. you could fill in the blank there. and the defense argued that the defendant in this case did not try to flee when he was arrested. he also brought up the defendant s attorney also brought up that his parents had put up their homes as collateral. but the judge, he acknowledged that saying i m aware of all of that, but at the end of
is not at war with russia. with ruthis is ukraine s war to figh. uk the second thing we have heard over and over again is that ukraine is winning that wa thar. rave ukrainian troops are brave and noble. russian troops are evil. and incompetent. the ukrainians are beating the russians. ir victo in the end, their victory i is inevitable. now, you re very familiar with these points because you heary day since ever last february. you ve heard them repeated by every power centem repeated , the united states , the pentagon, the white house, the leaders of both partie s in congress, ceos and celebrities, and most insistently of all, m from you ve heard them from virtually every single outlet lyy along the entire spectrum ol our national news media. these are the two essential themes of the war in ukraine and both of them are lies. k we know that they re lies because late last week, leakedea intelligence about the war in ukraine began to appear on social media briefing slides prepare
Glass, michael colangelo, becky mangold, christopher conroy, and catherine ellis. Good morning, emil bove, joined by President Trump to my loft, joined by todd blanche, susan necheles. The judge, good morning. Good morning, mr. Trump. So the matter called into the ng record is the peoples motion for contempt, meaning the prosecutions motion for e contempt. N the judge says, quote, Before Ia Hand down my decision, i wantedy to address the defense and mr. Trump. Mr. Trump, as you know, The S Prosecution has filed three separate motions asking this court to find you in contempt. In a moment, im going to hand down my decision on the third motion. Which i in which i find you in Criminal Contempt for the tenth time. Quote, it appears that the 1,000 fines are not serving as a deterrent. Therefore, going forward, this court will have to consider a Jail Sanction if recommended. H mr. Trump, it is important to understand that the last thing i want to do is put you in jail. You are the former pre
Immunity. you have the question of whether i can t even remember all of it. you have miami. you have hush money, you have d.c. e. jean carroll. atlanta. let s not forget alvin bragg who started all this with the first criminal indictment right here in manhattan. he s aufrb timed overlooks. he has a very full dance card and one of the things i wanted to point out is we have gone to a place where he is now amalgamated himself as a defendant and a candidate into one thing. these are campaign stops as much as they are court appearances. and the other piece of it is this is a settled matter. i want to put up here, to remind folks again, this is not the most sort of serious case in terms of criminality. i mean, obviously, stealing documents is worse. we might be out of time. well, never mind. i m not going to put up the lies he told. i m going to say good-bye to my guests. adam reese and charles coleman jr., it s been a wild night. thank you. we re continuing to follow tonight
Suggesting to tarrio to switch to encrypted apps rather than continue the exchange on a platform that would allow for the documentation of those communications. if you work in source work like i did, you know that you have to document each interaction that you have with the confidential informant. that is departmental policy. so, this is really interesting. mike, i m glad you re saying this. so i guess one of the questions i would have is, all right, if i m shane la partlmond for d.c.e and homeland security, and part of my job is doing what you re saying. building sources and building trust, getting in information, et cetera. investigators come to me, why not just tell them the truth. because what he s charged with is actually, as far as i know, not tipping off tarrio. he s charged with obstruction of justice and three counts of lying. so wouldn t investigators,