so, given the stage that that came, you know, i think that my advice is always to clients in those situations, not to read too much into that at this point, particularly given that the other two questions show us that the jury was likely carefully analyzing impeachment evidence, and evidence related to a critical theory of the case, the physical construction of the gun. so that shows us that we have an active, intelligent and working jury at this point. personally, i think it benefits the prosecution because those of us who have observed both weapons, touched both weapons know how both weapons operate, you know. we re hopeful the jury is going to see what we heard explained through expert testimony and see with their own eyes it s negligent, cull pauably negligent, it s reckless if not more to say you made a simple mistake in confusing those weapons. it shouldn t happen. and, of course, we will