at pretty much every turn. that has challenged jack smith to try to keep that date from sliding. if the court does move quickly, it is possible we could still have a trail on march 4th despite, over the absolute immunity issue. i want to point to a few things from the filing. the first is a warning from jack smith. he warns about the danger that the absolute maunt claim poses. he claims, rather than vindicating our constitutional framework, it threatens to license presidents to commit crimes in office. the founders would never have count nanced it. making it clear if the court sides with donald trump, this could have reverberations. he goes on to also really emphasize the historical appointment. how relevant this is for the future of america. he said siding with trump would threaten sorry, that this prosecution threatens to shatter the very bed rock of our rep republic. to engage in an unprecedented attack ever to retain power through criminal means despite having lost the
from covering this day-to-day, this is about timing. trump is trying to delay this trial from happening. it is currently slated to happen in march at the immunity fight has been a push by trump to try to push that trial date back as close to the election as possible and also in tandem with that the entire case itself is an election interference. he is really emphasizing the need for the appeals court to weigh in quickly even with the unusual request for the appeals court to implement the ruling, five days after making a decision, usually it takes longer for them to do so. that is just an example on how jack smith is stepping outside the box and pointing that his party is moving quickly. i want to give your substance of what is in the filing because there are some stark excerpts. jack smith is trying to use trump s own argument against him, hes, the defendant asserts thathis constitution threatens to shatter the very bad bedrock of our republic. to the contraryt defendant s c