It is described in the indictment, fuelled by lies. Lies by the defendant targeted at obstructing a Bedrock Function of the us government, the nations process of collecting, counting and certifying the results of the president ial election. The men and women of Law Enforcement who defended the us Capital Onjanuary The 6th are heroes. They are patriots and The Very Best of us. They did notjust defend a building, or the people sheltering in it they put their lives on the line to defend who we are as a country and as a people. They defended the very institutions and principles that defined the United States. Since the attack on our capital the Department Ofjustice Has remained committed to ensuring accountability for those criminally responsible for what happened that day. This case is brought consistent with that commitment. Our investigation of other individuals continues. In this case, my office will seek a speedy trial so that our evidence can be tested in court and judged by a jury o
make on that? i think that donald trump was to get i make on that? i think that| donald trump was to get a make on that? i think that - donald trump was to get a fair trial in donald trump was to get a fair trial in a donald trump was to get a fair trial in a jury donald trump was to get a fair trial in a jury that donald trump was to get a fair trial in a jury that is trial in a jury that is consisted trial in a jury that is consisted entirely. trial in a jury that isi consisted entirely of trial in a jury that is - consisted entirely of people wearing consisted entirely of people wearing red consisted entirely of people wearing red hats consisted entirely of people wearing red hats that - consisted entirely of people wearing red hats that seem| consisted entirely of people - wearing red hats that seem make america wearing red hats that seem make america great wearing red hats that seem make america great again. wearing red hats that seem make america great again.
they haven t used it since the 1930s but they can send the sergeant of arms out to arrest the person and bring that person in. the reality is our constitution gives congress broad investigative power and subpoena power but very little enforcement power. it relies on the other branches to enforce those subpoenas. so if hicks and donaldson decide not to show up then congress has a challenge in actually enforcing those subpoenas which is why we see so often congress working out the subpoenas with the party as opposed to taking such harsh measures as criminal constitution. this is a world of compromise as opposed to the justice department whose subpoenas must be enforced with criminal consequences. if you were a criminal defense attorney representing the president when you look at congress s most important witness here, who is it? whose testimony should concern