True to. abortion is an economic issue. how about an economic obligation on the other side? if a woman is required to carry a baby to term, if that s the requirement, should there not be a similar obligation for the father? absolutely. i think that men and women should be outraged at the court s potential decision. we ought to fully enforce the obligations of both parents to support children. but the most important issue is that nobody is forced to become apparent if they don t want to be. so, the fact that so many people are trying to treat this as just a woman s issue, it is a woman s issue. we re talking about controlling women s bodies. but this decision will have impact on meant to who will be asked to pay child support, will be sued for paternity, whose lives and economic opportunities will also be fundamentally changed becoming apparent. then, why aren t we looking at this as an issue for every american and not just women? is it because it is our bodies?