accountable. new york times with this, quote within hours of a jury finding mr. trump guilty last week, the anger conyield into demands for action. since then, the prominent gop leaders have demanded they use every instrument of power again democrats, included targeted investigations and prosecutors. here step miller puts it is every house committee controlled by republicans? in every way, it needs to right now with every republican d.a. to start is every donor off the sidelines and in the game, the rich guys, the wealthy guys? everything facet of republican party politics and power has to be used right-to-now to go toe to toe with marxism and beat these why do you have to talk to jesse waters that way? maybe he knows. i don t know. echoes miller s tirade, trump s comrades in arms in the january 6th bannon said in a text message to the times on tuesday that now is the moment for obscure republican prosecutors around the country to make a name for themselves by pro
Late this afternoon, the manhattan district attorney s filed its response, reading in part defendant s letter asserts that the stated basis for the court s orders no longer exist because the trial has concluded. the court et cetera orders however railroad not based on the need to avoid threats, but the broader bobble base to prevent actual harm to the integrity of the proceedings, to protect the orderly administration of this court and avoid risks to the administration of justice. andrew, it would appear abundantly clear that they re talking about alvin bragg about go to jail, that the gag order is more necessary now than ever before. let s just remember the gad order doesn t prevent donald trump from making any and all political attacks against joe biden and his administration. it doesn t protect and there s a carveout for the judge himself,
Danger. out added two questions this the party themselves had not added to the case asking whether or not faye, the federal court should have jurisdiction over this. whether the parties were appropriately before the court et cetera. this shows to me that they are looking for a way to finesse this issue. so they don t come down one way or the other, unless they absolutely can t avoid it. precisely because these are people who spent their whole lives dealing with the fall-out of roe v. wade. they have seen what it s done the court and the country. further more, they can see the political movement is accelerating among the people and there may not be a need for court. john: snarl ironically, justice ginsberg stalwart liberal of court in a speech before going on the court talked about roe v. wade as stopping the natural evolution and political accept tans of what was the more changing on abortion and that it caused the strife. the one lesson is that allow