propaganda. russia points to the united states and says washington is somehow behind that brazen drone attack on the kremlin. the white house calls this claim bs. a there s a word that comes to mind. i would tell you he s lying. it s a ludicrous claim. the united states had nothing to do with this. and the special counsel puts the trump organization in his sights. sources telling cnn jack smith s prosecutors are zeroing in on how long time president trump employees handled the evidence. up first for us, major breaking news right here in washington, d.c. a major victory for the justice department after prosecutoring leaders of the i object sur recollection. five members were convicted for various felony charges a short time ago. four of them, including the leader, was convicted of the most serious charge. that charge being seditious conspiracy. trial testimony detailed how the proud boys organized after trump s call for supporters to flood washington on the day the elect
Do a redo. To check out the piece on our they were very unhappy with the website. Quite fascinating. Mueller report. Thats going to wrap up this no collusion. No obstruction. Hour of msnbc live. No nothing. They are very unhappy. Andrea Mitchell Reports starts they are angry about it. Right now. They have to get ore their aver thank you. Right now power play. Anger. Wait a minute. They have to get over their donald trump gives the attorney anger and they have to get into general sweeping new authority To Declassify closely guarded infrastructure, drug prices and things like that because they want to do a redo like even the secrets about the Russia Investigation as he accuses fact they are asking bob mueller former fbi officials of treason, to come and testify. A crime punishable by death. He just gave them a 434page you look at comey, mccabe, report which says no collusion, probably people higher than which leads to absolutely no that. If you look at his lover, lisa obstruction. He jus
showing many, many, many exhibits over several months to this jury, and the jury is agreeing that these men were speaking to one another about coming together as a group and making sure that the riot stayed a riot. that the trump supporters on the capitol grounds on january 6th were moving trd into the building and can be convicted of both seditious conspiracy as well as other conspiracy ch charges. we re not done yet though. the jury hasn t reached a verdict on a couple counts. and a couple counts related to one person in particular. his name is dominic pozola. you have probably seen him in fete toes and he had a riot shield and was breaking into the capitol. he has been convict ed by this jury on some of those assault and property damage type of charges here in this case. but the jury has not yet decided whether he, too, in this case can be found guilty of seditious conspiracy.
maybe 75. you don t give straight news. these determine nagations about you give fake news. with fake news i m still winning can and can t be safely let in and out the nation of national the election. security rather than the if you gave serious, good news intelligence community the way you re supposed to, i d professionals? probably be at 70 or 75 based on i think those are some really important questions and the economy alone. questions for congressional oversight. congressional oversight, an on iran, sir. issue in great dispute because the president doesn t seem to believe they have the right to go ahead. that oversight. how is the justice department going to react to this? i just spoke to prime very poorly. minister modi and gave him by it s bone chilling on a couple warmest regards and counts. first, as ruth says, it gives congratulations. i just spoke to prime minister of course the president had ultimate authority but to accord modi minutes ago. it with this kind of
we don t know how the prosecution will proseed and we hope our blago comes to the microphone and entertains us before the program is over, you ll see him fly over our building and over this world. with u former prosecutor randy zellen and drew fin ling. you have spent plenty of time in courtrooms. can you offer us anything? there s war going on within the confines of that jury room. that s the reason why they wanted to hear the oath, because somebody is telling a holdout, you did not listen to the judge s oath and i want it read back. as far as the two verdicts, most likely they re not guilty because if you re going to go ahead shepard: not guilty verdicts? yes. if you concede to guilty on a couple counts, you may go with