This ruling that says he disagrees. and justice samuel alito wrote a full dissent, we are going t ask our experts for how to rea the tea leaves here in just second as well but what does this actuall mean about where we as a country stand in the large battle over abortion access? planned parenthood called th decision good news but they also said that th access to this drug should never have been in jeopardy in the first place. president biden said h continues to stand by the fda evidence based approval of the drug and called on the america people to use their vote a their voice and elect congress will pass a law restoring the protections of roe v. wade. nancy northrop, center of th center for reproductive rights said the supreme court s decision is a huge relief bu we are not out of the wood yet. joining us now are nancy northrop, president and ceo of the center for and tali-fardia
now, the lower court battle is complicated and we the, and ma lead to some chaos down th line for mifepristone access and we are going to talk t experts about that in just a moment but for now, for tonight, this drug is still widely available so, on a practical level, that is where we are. the question is, on a lega level, tonight s ruling is als quite interesting. there s a majority of justices who approved tonight s stay. but at least two did not that s justice clarence thomas said that he would have denied this day he did not explain why it was just a single line in this ruling that says he disagrees. and justice samuel alito wrote a full dissent, we are going t ask our experts for how to rea the tea leaves here in just second as well but what does this actuall mean about where we as a country stand in the large battle over abortion access? planned parenthood called th decision good news but they also said that th access to this drug should never have been in jeopardy in the first
Shake off lightly. i take it seriously and expect to make a decision in the near term. to me this isn t about the question of whom. not about me or any other individual. the question of the what and why. what does this country stand for and the conservative movement in this country stand for? we have a national identity crisis in america today. you ask people my age or any age what it means to be an american in the year 2023 you get a blank stare in response. i m on a mission to deliver evan answer to that question. revive the basic rules of the road from merit to free speech to democratic self-governance. those are the basic rules of the road that i think most americans agree on. i m giving thought to whether or not pursuing the presidency is the best and most effective way of advancing that vision of american national identity. that s what i think we re missing. harris: if you do run for the republican nomination that will be a lot of fodder for all the debates and make it spicy al
Conservative party mps and the conservative party memberships. it s not really a test of where the country stand. especially on these issues and at the moment having said that, the question of moving the brexit agenda forward will clearly be important and all the other questions that define the boris johnson administration when people were able to focus on those issues, the response to covid, the question of the economy, the conflict unfolding in ukraine are going to be important issues. i still come back to my original statement that the number one question is getting rid of boris johnson, the question is whether those high- profile figures in his cabinet are ultimately going to be tainted because of their associations with them and boris johnson and where the membership ultimately will pick a candidate or perhaps create some kind of distance between that administration and in that case we are looking at some of
Districts across the country stand against directives like critical race theory, sexually explicit school literature and constantly changing covid 19 protocols. the school board meetings entered in shouting matches and even arrests but one parent who herself is a school board member in sarasota, florida says federal intervention goes beyond the pale. no acts of violence or threats should ever be tolerated and i believe local law enforcement has been quick to respond but this act by the national school board association, taxpayer-funded lobbying group intended to silence and intimidate parents who have a different point of view. republican lawmakers grilling in deputy attorney general lisa monaco slamming the doj for targeting parents while violent crimes servers across the us and calling the directive and attempt to chill speech from anyone opposed to the biden