completely unacceptable. when you talk about a completely unacceptable. when you talk about a mechanism completely unacceptable. when you talk about a mechanism for - completely unacceptable. when you talk about a mechanism for mps - completely unacceptable. when you talk about a mechanism for mps to l talk about a mechanism for mps to access more security, who makes the decision on that? because different individuals will obviously feel differently about the level of threats made against them. some may dismiss them more readily than others, so are mps themselves and their staff in the best position to make a judgment on this, or should there be someone, is there someone making a more neutraljudgment? i making a more neutraljudgment? i agree with that sentiment entirely, currently it is down to the individual mp to decide if they want more support or if they want more advice or infrastructure. they can call upon the counterterrorism security advisers who exist up and down the count