unfairly within the white house, think that this has been dragging on for a while, would like to see it end, in part because it has been a cloud as the president has said or indicated before over what he is trying to do in office. what s amazing about this tweet, you guys, is that it s like he s celebrating the one year anniversary of mueller s appointment along with news stories about it. it is typical for news outlets to write a story of this nature marking the one year. why he then calls more attention to it and amplifies it continues to mystify most of his aides. on the same day that his hand picked fbi director says it s not a witch hunt and republicans and democrats on two different senate committees say the intelligence community was right, it happened, it was real and we need to know more. exactly right. he continues to express some reservations about his hand picked fbi director i think in part because the president divides everything into an
wants to sit down with mueller. i m sure he thinks he probably can answer a lot of these questions. his lawyers probably recognize it as a bad idea. what s the fodder of that report? he may bring other indictments. was there obstruction of justice, all becomes fodder for potential impeachment proceeding if you have a democratic house. that s where things get nasty. this is what giuliani and the president is preparing for now, what the next year is going to look like of trying to undermine who mueller is, what the investigation was, and what his findings are purchase. and we just have to keep remembering how leak free the mueller investigation has been. how little we know about what they re doing. remember when he indicted the 13 russians. no one even knew he was investigating that. one of the questions legal issues he has not yet addressed mueller, is the whole issue of the hacking.
of is whatever mueller comes up with will not lead to a bipartisan consensus. democrats will see it one way. republicans will see it another way. and i just think that s a certainty. the ultimate findings, i don t know what they ll be. but certainly the reaction will be there. it makes 1998 look far lessee involved in that tribal moment than we re in right now. i mean, look at the senate versus the house intel committee. this is your congress at work, which is going in two different directions. it s not very constructive. and i think that s exactly right. the one thing that trump has done, the bar is pretty high now i think for mueller. he comes anywhere near where i think we are, i think the president will have a field day and say i told you. look at all the stuff they don t have. jeffrey, tell us how we should see the financial
tomorrow and on saturday we ll be live for prince harry and meghan markle s big day. i can t tell you how many people have told me they are setting eir alar and they will be awake for this noto miss moment. really? really. in fact, one of my close friends in california three hours earlier is going to a movie theater that is streaming it all live at 1:00 a.m. i guess i m wrong. i thought we weren t about monarchies here in this country. we re about love. wait. we ve had too much fun. we must go. the president just tweeted about robert mueller s probe one year after it began. i bet you can get what he said. we ll break down the partisan divides between these two republicans on your screen right now. we got maggie haberman next.
is your source michael avenatti s source? i can t speak to the exact chain of command of who had these documents at one point other than to say this is the source who originally made them public. this source says he or she became alarmed when they noticed the suspicious activity reports gone. how do they know that they re gone from the system and not moved somehow? let s be careful about the term gone. you re right. one of the things we talk about at length in this story is all the possible explanations including many that could be more benign than what this whistle-blower feared. it is possible prosecutors we talked to and people we talked to said, for instance, the southern district of new york or special counsel mueller said quarantine these, restrict them in some way. what i highlight, alisyn, is every expert we talk to said that almost never happens. they don t have a procedure for