rule today on whether the former white house council don mcgahn has to testified under subpoena to congress. but it may not be the game-changer some are setting it up to be. we re going to explain why. first, george papadopoulos is running for congress. he filed the run last month but he announced it this morning on cable news. he s running in california s 25th district. the seat now vacant after katie hill resigned. last year he was sentenced to two weeks in federal prison after pleading guilty to lying to the fbi. slow turkey. along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting. chantix reduces the urge so when the day arrives, you ll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix,
otezla. show more of you. lindsey is about to go down in a way that i think he s going to regret his whole life. i hope there s nothing there. i like joe biden. i like him a lot. i think he s a fine man. but we re not going to live in a country where just one party gets investigated. that was lindsay graham just within the last few minutes. the first time we re hearing from him since joe biden unloaded over the weekend on graham for ramping up efforts of making the bidens a focus of the impeachment proceedings. we re also watching today for a court ruling that might have big implications for the impeachment proceedings. a judge is set to decide whether former white house council don mcgahn must testify. the court battle started after
that there was obstruction of justice as was laid out in the mueller report when the president tried to get mcgahn to take action, to either get sessions i forget if he was trying to get sessions to unrecuse himself or fire mueller or get sessions to fire mueller, but it was obstruction. should that get added then? do you believe that should be an article that gets added to what your committee is going to work on related to the impeachment proceedings? it s certainly something for speaker pelosi and chairman nadler to consider and they will make those decisions. you must not i know, hallie, you re too young to remember carnac and johnny carson? i know my johnny carson history a little bit. i will brush up on it if you re going to talk about it here. the answers were in a sealed jar of mayonnaise or something like that. i will admit when something goes over my head. congressman steve cohen, we ll
these are all the signs of a fascist authoritarian government where nobody can do anything that the boss doesn t like and the boss fires you left and right. and it s not reality tv. somebody needs to come to the rescue. i don t know if it s takes two and come back strong, fair and young, where are you. but there s something going wrong in washington. i want to quickly get you on the subpoena that your committee has issued to don mcgahn. we understand we re looking at a potential ruling today on whether or not the former white house counsel will have to testify. if he does, can you talk about how that fits into the ongoing impeachment process, whether you think this adds any kind of article to potential impeachment proceedings if it relates to the mueller investigation? just talk through some of your thinking on that. if mcgahn testifies as he did in his mueller depositions or mueller testimony, it will prove
22 months and tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer money. people like don mcgahn have already complied and gave dozens of hours of testimony before and don jr. has testified previously. so, i know america is going to see this for what it is, which is an attempted do over of something that they ve already funded and that we patiently complied with completely. let me just ask you about that word do over because you re referring to it as a do over but democrats on capitol hill say they have an oversight responsibility. mueller himself in his report cited congress as the authority that would follow up on his report, essentially. kellyanne, i guess the question is, if there is nothing to hide, why not cooperate? why not direct barr and mcgahn to cooperate and turn over all the documents if you really want to move on? as you know, many of those documents are privileged. i want your viewers to recognize the facts there. many of these documents are privileged. so, they will not be turne