He can express any views he was. Wants. The big mistake was not recusing himself. When he tweeted he would make sure trump doesnt become president and has an insurance policy, he could not be fair and just. By not recusing himself, he violated his position of trust. I would not go too far and blame it on the top authorities of the fbi. They didnt know. When they did know, they demoted him and took him out of the investigation. I think its a blemish, but i dont think its a fatal flaw in the investigation. I think there are deeper and more fatal flaws. Ultimately i think it was the right decision. Tucker dont those texts suggest why he didnt recuse himself . Its one thing to express a political opinion. Do i it for a leaving. Living. He was suggesting that his opinions would drive the crimmial investigation that he was conducting. Thats subversion of justice. Thats the issue. He denied under oath that in any way he was influenced by his hatred for thump in any of his professional decisio
gotten it wrong and it s part of a wake-up call, stop lying, starts telling don t like telling the truth, give the american people what they deserve, the facts and nothing but the facts. sean: you ve known donald trump for three decades or longer, your reaction to all this? four. sean: for decades. you are much older than i am. you and i were out thursday night. that s the kind of relationship i had with the president back in the day. there were plenty of times in public and in private where guys are guys and people are saying this and that. he never, ever uttered any word or phrase that could be remotely considered racist or racial. it is an absolute canard. it is a lie. and for her to tape, to secretly tape the white house chief of staff and other aids and the president of the united states, even in the secure situation room, it goes beyond what frank
going never-porn lawyer right out of the gate. you never know what could happen. tucker: you are a wise man. great to see you, thanks for sitting in. you were great. the guest host at the end of last week, you should have got michael avenatti, he would have done a much better job. tucker: i don t know who that is. that s about it for us. every night at 8:00 the show that is the sworn enemy of line pomposity and groupthink. sean hannity right now. ten seconds later. sean: you don t know how to hit the post. have you ever done radio in your life? 16 seconds over. tucker: six seconds later. sean: good thing we actually follow each other so it doesn t mess up the reruns. tucker: by the way, i ve given you many, many seconds over the years. i m just taking a few back. sean: good to see you, great show. welcome to hannity. incredible breaking news night all over the place, the corrupt anti-trump fbi agent peter strzok has finally been fired,
mainstream media s obsession of the week which is omarosa. she was fired from her position as a white house aide back in december but she is now hocking a new book with many salacious over-the-top claims about president trump. sean spicer, i spoke with him earlier tonight that her claim that he was paid to praise trump and other things she d been saying are all totally bogus. katrina pierson, i also spoke to about an hour ago. called omarosa disloyal, unhinged and she claims that trump is racist and everything else she said and says that things that omarosa is now saying are also not true. in disputing things that she says in her interviews. frank luntz will join us in a moment. he called omarosa s claim that he heard trump use a racial slur flat out false. big question tonight, how does a publisher in this day and age of lawsuits, how do they not fact-check any of these claims? how does any self-respecting publisher allow this to go to
he s the one that said that hillary should win 100 million-0. he s not biased? he also wrote he could smell those of us that supported trump at a walmart in southern virginia. probably bitterly clinging to our gods, gun, bible and religion but we are the irredeemable deplorable is that apparently smell. in june, the office of inspector general reported strzok s actions were not only indicative of a biased state of mind that he had been even more seriously it implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidates electoral prospects. what we ve been saying. despite all of this, a very smug peter strzok testified on capitol hill that he wasn t biased at all. that s a joke, but take a look yourself. let me be clear, unequivocally and under oath, not once in my 26 years of defending our nation did my personal opinions impact any official action i took.