today s scotland? it is of its grandeur and pageantry sit in today s scotland? today s scotland? it is such a good auestion today s scotland? it is such a good question because today s scotland? it is such a good question because as today s scotland? it is such a good question because as we today s scotland? it is such a good question because as we can - today s scotland? it is such a good question because as we can see, l today s scotland? it is such a good i question because as we can see, and we can see right now, on the street behind me, there is objection here, complaint, protest, notjustabout the monarchy although that is what these protesters on the royal mile are complaining about, both about the cost of this event and the very nature of the constitution of the united kingdom itself, arguing for songs at least an elected head of state, but there is also as you no considerable debate about the constitutional future of scotland in political terms. independence may have rec
borisjohnson? in the mag well, borisjohnson of course is the gentleman who brought us the irish sea border and petitioned the united kingdom to the protocol so i think one approaches it with that in mind. a thing, though, he to suggest that the government should not squander such leveraged as the protocol bill gives the government by the fundamentals here are realising that the protocol, yes, it is about economics but fundamentally, it is an assault on the constitution of the united kingdom because under the protocol, a part of the united kingdom, northern ireland, are subject to and within the ambit of the eu s customs code which decrees that gb, the other part of the united kingdom as a foreign country when it comes to trading with northern ireland and we are also subject to the eu single market rules which mean that northern ireland alone within united kingdom are subject to laws made in a foreign legislature, namely, the european parliament. find foreign legislature, namely, the e
period of consultation to delete them. these will go into our manifesto and it will be about implementation. from day one, labour will be about implementing these proposals to start getting the constitution of the united kingdom back to a much more modern place, get trust factor politics. let’s get trust factor politics. let s take one get trust factor politics. let s take one of get trust factor politics. let s take one of the get trust factor politics. let s take one of the most - get trust factor politics. let s take one of the most eye catching proposal, the abolition of the house of lords. so the labour party is now committed to abolishing the house of lords? we committed to abolishing the house of lords? ~ . , .., ., ., lords? we are fully committed to a second chamber lords? we are fully committed to a second chamber and lords? we are fully committed to a second chamber and making - lords? we are fully committed to a second chamber and making sure l lords? we are ful
required and partly because the judgment has been prioritised over less urgent matters. this is a brief explanation of the judgment handed down this morning. the full reasons for the court s decision are set out in the judgment itself. the scottish parliament was established by the united kingdom parliament at westminster in 1998, when it enacted the scotland act. the scotland act gives the scottish parliament limited powers. in particular, the scottish parliament has no power to legislate in relation to matters that are reserved to the united kingdom parliament at westminster. those reserved matters include fundamental aspects of the constitution of the united kingdom, including the union