incurred as a result of allowing this conflict to grind on. u.s. officials as you mentioned, talking about this potentially lasting through the end of the year. that is much, much longer than anyone had anticipated. and you can only expect the sorts of scenes that we have really only witnessed in social media videos, from satellite images that have taken place in cities like mariupol, where thousands are believed to be dead. where maternity hospitals have been decimated. that you re going to see more of that playing out across the country as the second offensive gets underway. so it comes back tom point again. the constant push-pull, the tension between wanting to end the war, not wanting to concede an inch but also really wanting to preserve innocent life to the best of his ability. and we have a lot more on that subject on sunday.
voice within the left wing. he is the person in the president s ear saying you need to do more, you need to stick to your promises, what you said, and there s this constant push pull of what the president will go along with. again, could there be another fresh appeal by others in the administration to go along with this, there might be but i think it s hard to plan for this twice and not go ahead with it twice if you re a president looking at immigration in your calilous, and that s the cold reality. number one, there will be collateral deportations, you have learned which means people who aren t even targeted if they re undocumented and on the scene when these raids happen, they could be collected as well. and number two, you say there s some apprehension among officials who are involved in this about arresting kids, basically. correct. and again, i think it s no
missiles. these missiles included cruise missiles capable of going 100 miles out to strike ships at sea. they flew a missile all the way over japan and were backing away from the world s nuclear agencies that keep track of nuclear programs. that also excited concern. of course, by 2003, by this point, more developments. we found out, in fact, they did have a nuclear program, which they denied for a period of time and on and on it progressed, wolf. here s the thing, throughout that process, there was a constant push-pull. there would be fears, alarm around the world, and often what followed were deals, concessions, that gave them food or gave them fuel or gave them new technology. wolf? but in the past few years, it seems to have entered a whole new phase, hasn t it? it s as if these negotiations and results keep moving up to a more dangerous level. by 2009, look at this. we re talking about these border tensions where they shelled those islands off the coast of south korea, sank th
they denied for a period of time and on and on it progressed, wolf. here s the thing, throughout that process, there was a constant push-pull. there would be fears, alarm around the world, and often what followed were deals, concessions, that gave them food or gave them fuel or gave them new technology. wolf? but in the past few years, it seems to have entered a whole new phase, hasn t it? it s as if these negotiations and results keep moving up to a more dangerous level. by 2009, look at this. we re talking about these border tensions where they shelled those islands off the coast of south korea, sank that ship out there. and mind you, this is not everything that s happened. a lot more has gone on and, of course, now we re where we are today where we re talking about programs that are much more advanced. we re talking about missiles that are capable of flying in stages in space, we have a lot more talk about their nuclear weapons program. it s as if the negotiations in this great