that is also true. they can t both be right. well. that is also true. they can t both be right. well, sometimes - that is also true. they can t both be right. well, sometimes you l that is also true. they can t both l be right. well, sometimes you can that is also true. they can t both - be right. well, sometimes you can do thins be right. well, sometimes you can do thin . s that be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you think be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you think are things that you think are constitutionally a bit weird. if it will help constitutionally a bit weird. if it will help the general because of fighting will help the general because of fighting the pandemic. let me summarise, i think there is an issue summarise, i think there is an issue it summarise, i think there is an issue it is summarise, i think there is an issue. it is not a huge, huge issue. not as issue.
would be a global outbreak. tiitj h there was a 50 50 chance of would be a global outbreak.- there was a 50 50 chance of being would be a global outbreak- there was a 50 50 chance of being a global outbreak and not 100% chance. i m not exactly sure of when he first said it to me, but this is also why i wanted cobra to wake up whitehall to this threat. you also why i wanted cobra to wake up whitehall to this threat. whitehall to this threat. you must have appreciated, whitehall to this threat. you must have appreciated, mr whitehall to this threat. you must have appreciated, mr hancock, i whitehall to this threat. you must l have appreciated, mr hancock, but having have appreciated, mr hancock, but having been have appreciated, mr hancock, but having been told have appreciated, mr hancock, but having been told by have appreciated, mr hancock, but having been told by the have appreciated, mr hancock, but having been told by the chief- having been told by the chief
For forth. mr. trump does not contest the assertion. it was never in the alternative should be rescinded. michael avenatti and stephanie clifford have been fighting hard to get the president to give a deposition. stormie daniels started this whole litigation at the beginning of this year. she said trump may not have signed this agreement but the agreement was null and void from the very beginning based upon the fact there was no consideration given. there were a lot of legal theories ta went inhat went int lawsuit. this is what she wanted. she wanted a declaration from a judge there was no binding, nondisclosure agreement. this is what trump is stipulating to. if a judge determines that there was no agreement and that there s nothing to be enforced against any party then stephanie clifford may be looking for