taliban did was said we will wait you out. and president biden said we will be out by 9/11 using that date as an offensive remark to the american people, now you have a failed system in afghanistan with the american allies withdrawing, so if you continue to up and leave, it will implode catastrophically even more so. you had a good point, air superiority is something we have always had in afghanistan. and our predator program dominated the skies under president trump, and we can do that again if we retake bagram airfield, because that is the center country ops. and on top of that, you do need to start successfully withdrawing the american citizens and also military personnel when conditions on the ground permit. so i think you have to combine what these folks are saying. i don t think it s a destructive one or the other, but it s conjunctive, we have to do both. we have to reestablish and then safety remove our personnel and allies.
president. and a lie detector test for the adult film star who also says she had sex with the president when he was, in her words, a goofy reality tv star. that of course is stormy daniels, the client of michael avenatti who is back with us along with trump lawyer michael cohen s attorney and friend, david schwartz. so michael, you mentioned section 8.6, says the agreement has to be signed by all parties to be enforceable. david points to this clause right before the line on the nda in which the pseudonym for donald trump is used and it says and/or, meaning what i guess from your interpretation meaning not only does stormy daniels have to sign it, her pseudonym, michael cohen, but and/or donald trump. that line is not signed. and/or would seem to indicate either he can sign it or not. and/or is a term of art, anderson, under california law, and it s actually in the conjunctive, in the plural. even if it wasn t, if the intent
night, aggressive, talk over one another, throw in some insults and you win? that was good television in addition to the facts of the case. i have to say avenatti is correct in that there is a signature line for donald trump. he is named as a party at the beginning of the agreement. by the way, in california, most courts treat the and/or in the contest of the contract as in the conjunctive. the or would be ignored and it s an and. stipulations are in that agreement that are totally within the control of donald trump, such as david dennisson, aka, donald trump, gets to pick the governing law, 8.2 or 8.6, somewhere in there. beneficiary doesn t have that type of stipulation in a contract, nor does he or she have a signatory line. i do agree with avenatti. this will be interesting how it plays out in terms of whether it s enforceable or not. can we just back up for a
blah, blah, blah. you re right. i have the agreement right here or the complaint right here. they have the right to do that according to the agreement. we should point out this this civil lawsuit may cause in whole agreement to be determined to be just voidable. the court may say the agreement doesn t have to be adhered to and she may be able to tell her story and listening to her attorney all day it s clear she has a story to tell that may include photographs and text messages. so it s not at all certain that it s just he said she said. there may be some other form of evidence that supports her allegation of an affair. in the settlement document go ahead, mark. the challenge with that, though, is guided in the disjunctive and conjunctive in the heading of the agreement. it says and/or. so it really is going to be a tough road for her to try to get this set aside, because it doesn t necessarily list all parties. that s their claim to try to try to vacate this and set it asi
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20121029:21:10:00 comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.