the constitutions with clear legislative businesses for the business of politics, and what we re seeing is people not just chipping away but taking huge chunks of it away. if congressionalo oversight no longer functions you said, it s made it more likely the next populous will succeed where trump failed. explain. well, look, we have seen it time and time again, historically and in contemporary politics elsewhere in the world. you know, russia for example, that i spend time seem making a comparison with in the book. boris yelsin who succeeded putin. he resolved it by firing on parliament to shell the army out. that way, he ran through the
this? i don t you want the president to do the things he said he was going to do? i am not applauding this at all. i actually believe that the patriotic thing to do is come forward and raise your right hand before a congressionalo committee and tell that committee what concerns you. if you are a republican at home right now and you find comfort that aides are working in this way to prevent the president from abusing his power, you are on the way to electing a democratic congress. but you should let elected leaders check the president, not his aides. i share the same concerns. tucker: last time i checked and again, what you are doing is making a sophisticated argument that again i do not fully understand. god forbid we are sophisticated here. tucker: may be sophisticated is the wrong word. confusing about democrats in the upcoming midterm election, i get that is a priority for you. i believe in a constitution that would check the president. tucker: i am not sure you believ