the political brunt and the health brunt and economic brunt. how much damage do you think the novak djokovic row and now the row involving a second player, who is saying she is pretty much giving up and is going home, how much is this damaging australia do you think? and particularly the australian government, which seems to have taken a contradictory view on this before the public row kicked up, it appeared to be quite relaxed about him coming. first of all, i think djokovic. is a marvellous tennis player and my money would be on him to go | past roger federer and rafael nadal| to take 21 grand slam titles they are all level at 20, - as you know. but having said that, - i think it s important to say that i do not sympathise i with his stance on vaccines. now, there is of course a confusion the confusion being, from what i can make out, | a circular that was sent out
to take 21 grand slam titles they are all level on 20, - as you know. but having said that, - i think it s important to say that i do not sympathise i with his stance on vaccines. now, there is of course - a confusion the confusion being, from what i can make out, a circular that was sent out - by the australian open authorities i to say that anyone who has had covid in the past six months - in other words, from the 31st ofjuly onwards - was exempt in terms of taking a vaccine. and then, of course, when he arrives in australia, he is stopped because the authorities feel that he should have - taken his vaccinations. this will not be resolved, i dare say, until monday, but it s unpleasant. | i don t think it shows australia in particularly consistent light,
is a marvellous tennis player, and my money would be on him to go past roger federer- and rafael nadal to take 21 grand slam titles i they are all level- on 20, as you know. but having said that, - i think it s important to say that i do not sympathise i with his stance on vaccines. now, there is of course - a confusion the confusion being, from what i can make out, a circular that was sentl out by the australian open i authorities to say that anyone who has had covid in the past six months, in other words, i from the 31st ofjuly onwards, was exempt in terms- of taking a vaccine. and then, of course, - when he arrives in australia, he is stopped because the authorities feel. that he should have i taken his vaccinations.
first of all, i think djokovic. is a marvellous tennis player, and my money would be on him to go past roger federer- and rafael nadal to take 21 grand slam titles i they are all level- on 20, as you know. but having said that, - i think it s important to say that i do not sympathise i with his stance on vaccines. now, there is of course - a confusion the confusion being, from what i can make out, a circular that was - sent out by the australian open authorities to say that anyone l who has had covid inj the past six months, in other words, from the 31st ofjuly onwards, was exemptj in terms of taking a vaccine. and then, of course, - when he arrives in australia, he is stopped because the authorities- feel that he should have taken his vaccinations. i this will not be resolved, i dare say, until monday, but it s unpleasant. i don t think it shows . australia in particularly