leaves abortion a question for each state to settle. that heads up if you will by no means makes this day any less consequential. justice samuel aleto says roe was egregious from the start. in a joint rebuttal the court s three liberals wrote this, with sorrow for this court but more for the many ill-man s american women who today have lost a fundamental constitutional protection, we dissent. the impact nationwide will be limit. the role reversal was the goal, of course, of a decades long conservative campaign to tilt the courts their way. the three trump appointees to the high court, the culmination of that. now a new legal chapter unfolds state by state as does a new political fight. we ll hear from president biden shortly. and nancy pelosi vows make abortion now the big deal in the campaign. reporter: the supreme court here issuing its most consequential decision in decades holding there s no longer a federal constitutional right to get an abortion and now handing the is
andrea mitchell has more news now. right now, the supreme court ruling 6-3 that the president of the united states does have immunity for official acts. in the most anticipated case of the year, the supreme court redraws the line between presidential and private acts, saying that he can be prosecuted for unofficial acts, but denying donald trump s request for complete immunity. much of mr. trump s alleged conduct in the federal election interference case could be off limits. that case now further delayed into after the election as the case is going back to the district court to decide what is official and what is not before there can even be a trial. plus, continuing the fight. the biden family circling the wagons after the president s disastrous debate performance. elected officials willing to give him a few days to prove he s up to a grueling campaign. privately, many of them are questioning whether this was one bad night or something more serious. good day, everyone. t
Week. susanna, the thought that these opinions are still being written. i think they re still being tinkered in with. in particular concurrents and dissents going back and forth. i want to answer what the majority says. no, i want to answer what the concurrent said and they ll get them out by this week. let s talk about these cases. doma, defense of marriage act, the expectation is? the expectation is, that they re going to strike down the defense part of the defense of marriage act in which the federal government refuses to look at whether you re married under state law. under the federal law you will be married if you re married validly under state law. maybe in terms of prop 8? i don t think they re going to split the difference.