Donald trumps legal team can show him the sensitive materials in the case, but trump cannot take notes on any information that would identify witnesses and, according to the Protective Order, quote, during any time that the defendant reviews sensitive materials outside of Defense Councils presents, the defendant must not have access to any device capable of photocopying, recording, or otherwise replicating the sensitive materials, including a smart cellular device. This Protective Order was a partial win for jack smiths team, who originally sought to prevent the public release of all evidence given to donald trump. Lets not forget these rules for sensitive materials are being enforced on the twice impeached former president who was comfortable with leaving classified documents in a bathroom at his florida residence. Donald trumps legal team has stuck to a very obvious strategy in this case. We naked about First Amendment rights, delay, and then make it some more and then try the case i
Your friday night. You too, buddy. All right. Today, the federal judge overseeing Special Counsel jack smiths case into Donald Trumps attempt to overturn the 2020 election and shoot a Protective Order. Judge Tanya Chutkan establish limits on what evidence in the case trump cant discuss publicly. Judge chutkan ordered that donald trump cannot disclose sensitive materials, including recordings, transcripts, interview reports, and related exhibits of witness interviews and materials obtained from other governmental entities. Donald trumps legal team can show him the sensitive materials in the case, but trump cannot take notes on any information that would identify witnesses and, according to the Protective Order, quote, during any time that the defendant reviews sensitive materials outside of Defense Councils presents, the defendant must not have access to any device capable of photocopying, recording, or otherwise replicating the sensitive materials, including a smart cellular device. Th
It kurt in another county, as long as one overt act for rico occurred in folding county it would stick. georgia s rego statute quote requires a pattern of misconduct as shown by violations of two or more cries specified in the statute these predicate crimes can include commuting or submitting the computer trespassers you just mentioned and influencing witnesses. so, given all of that, amy lee, what challenges could d.a. willis face in pursuing georgia rico charges against donald trump and his allies? sure. it is a broad statute, it is supposed to be very liberally constrained, but there could be defenses that people simply weren t acting in concert. that they had gone rogue where they were interrelated, and that everybody was sort of doing their own thing. that seems difficult given the activity that we know about
The basis for a racketeering charge, including in that list is the computer trespass felony and that is what the allegation is, that happened in the voting machines in county georgia, where the gop officials down there went in on looked at what was going. on the did not once, not twice, but three different times. and so that is one potential predicate back and even though it kurt in another county, as long as one overt act for rico occurred in folding county it would stick. georgia s rico statute quote requires a pattern of misconduct as shown by violations of two or more cries specified in the statute these predicate crimes can include committing or submitting the computer trespassers you just mentioned and influencing witnesses. so, given all of that, amy lee, what challenges could d. a. willis face in pursuing georgia rico charges against donald