wednesday s oral argument on abortion could be america s most important day in court. remind us with the status quo is in terms of abortion and what significance we should attach to some the things that are being set on wednesday? it is some the things that are being set on wednesday? on wednesday? it is quite astonishing on wednesday? it is quite astonishing that on wednesday? it is quite astonishing that all - on wednesday? it is quite astonishing that all of - on wednesday? it is quite l astonishing that all of these on wednesday? it is quite - astonishing that all of these years after roe astonishing that all of these years after roe versus astonishing that all of these years after roe versus wade astonishing that all of these years after roe versus wade and - astonishing that all of these years after roe versus wade and all- astonishing that all of these years after roe versus wade and all thej after roe versus wade and all the years after roe versus wade and all the y
one country to systems. they ve been very clear one country to systems. they ve been very clear that taiwan is an independent state and so, other countries independent state and so, other countries in the region are watching these countries in the region are watching these changes in behaviours and they are adapting themselves and so, i think are adapting themselves and so, i think that are adapting themselves and so, i think that is why presumably, japan wants think that is why presumably, japan wants to think that is why presumably, japan wants to increase the cost to china. china wants to increase the cost to china. china realty wants to increase the cost to china. china really wants to invade or even impose china really wants to invade or even impose a china really wants to invade or even impose a blockade on taiwan, japan is starting impose a blockade on taiwan, japan is starting to speak out now. four donald trump may turn out to have been america s most impo
inevitable, i think. that treats a aradox inevitable, i think. that treats a paradox because inevitable, i think. that treats a paradox because the inevitable, i think. that treats a paradox because the big - inevitable, i think. that treats a | paradox because the big critique inevitable, i think. that treats a i paradox because the big critique was judicial activism has come from the liberals committed come from the left and they created all these new rights that weren t envisioned by the constitution. now some of the rights they created, conservatives think could be uncreated because they should not have been created by courts in the first place. it’s a courts in the first place. it s a false the courts in the first place. it s a false the economy. courts in the first place. it s a false the economy. it - courts in the first place. it s a false the economy. it doesn tj courts in the first place. it s a i false the economy. it doesn t really work any more and in fact, what
more than 20 us states that have abortion laws on their books that would get triggered should there be any rollback or change to roe v wade and in effect, you would have abortion outlawed or severely curtailed by more than half the united states if the us supreme court goes ahead and does this. this is an earthquake. this is huge of the go ahead with it. this is the case the been waiting for for years and there is huge pressure on this conservatives that have joined the court recently. but organisations like the federal society to hold their ground because some of the decisions in the past couple of years on abortion cases did not go their way. so, years on abortion cases did not go theirway. so, it is years on abortion cases did not go their way. so, it is a huge focus on how this goes down. taste their way. so, it is a huge focus on how this goes down. their way. so, it is a huge focus on how this goes down. we are going to have to wait how this goes down. we are going to have to
sounded very different tune on wednesday than what they did during their confirmation hearings in the senate. and brett cavanaugh and two of the trump nominees to the court, during their senate confirmation hearings, brett cavanaugh said he viewed review way is settled law and established precedent that could not be overturned. and made similar kinds of noises, should we not use their personal views to interpret their personal views to interpret the law and what they said on wednesday was very much about brett cavanaugh saying why should abortion be an issue for the supreme court, indicating that he thinks the state should be kicked back to the individual states to handle. the reality is, what you have is by indications, the conservative majority will try to to undo roe versus wade, they don t know how far they will go, but already, you have