we saw the attempts in 2020 to get people to do that. to get state legislatures to clear our knit states of electors. to get secretaries of states to overturn the results of state elections. none of that happened, but in 2022 there have been new people put in place, who are potentially going to be ready, in 2024, to steal an election, should that be necessary. so no, i don t think we ve done nearly enough to deal with the risks that our election systems are facing, the serious risks coming up in 2024. let s speak specifically about some of those risks, as part of your analysis you write, quote, congress must amanda replace the 1887 electoral count act. not only to confirm that the vice president has no unilateral authority to accept or reject electoral college votes, but also to make it harder for senators or representatives to raise frivolous objections to a liberal college vote counts
coming up in 2024. let s speak specifically about some of those risks, as part of your analysis you write, quote, congress must amanda replace the 1887 electoral count act. not only to confirm that the vice president has no unilateral authority to accept or reject electoral college votes, but also to make it harder for senators or representatives to raise frivolous objections to a liberal college vote counts there was some talk about a bipartisan compromise on the electoral count act, which seems to have fizzled out. at this point, what should democrats do? is there time for them to act unilaterally while they still have the majority of both the house, the senate, and the white house. i think the best hope of getting something through is not gonna be unilateral action by democrats, democrats tried for over a year to pass the freedom to vote act the john lewis voting rights advancement act. they can t do it because joe