issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
Commonly referred to as ufos, two a former navy pilot and commander had seen such objects themselves. they warned these present a national security problem and the government has been too secretive about them. the third to testify, former air force intelligence officer david grush had this exchange with representative nancy mace. do you believe officials at the highest levels of our national security apparatus have unlawfully withheld information from congress and cob verted our oversight authority? there are certain elected leaders that had more information. i m not sure what they have shared with certain members, but certainly i would not be surprised. you ve stated the government is in possession of potentially non human spacecraft. based on your experience and extensive conversations with experts, do you believe our government has made contact with