They name. But certainly the former president s team has spent the day bracing for bad news. They appear to believe that this could potentially reference him. That his name could be one of those on those ten indictments that were returned. Theyve issues taken just a few moments ago. Lashing out at the District Attorney, fani willis here. Something that we have seen the former president doing repeatedly on social media in recent days. They are actually accusing them of Election Interference. Which we should note is, of course, ironic given that what the heart of the indictments potentially. Lets go back to cnn sarah murphy who has been outside the courthouse in atlanta all day. Sarah, obviously we are waiting to see when we are going to potentially hear from baku District Attorney, fani willis, that trump has been attacking here. Whats the latest that you have heard . , thats right, i mean, she is still expected to make remarks to the press this evening. But obviously they want to get t
Here, she is not an expert in clerks and refused to answer the questions. Yeah, throughout the day today, beginning early this morning, our team has been outside of the courthouse alongside numerous other members of the media and everyone was anticipating or waiting for potential indictment against the former president today and earlier today there was buzz or information circulating he had been indicted and reuters published the indictment around the lunchtime hour thachl generated buzz that the indictment had come down. All of a sudden the Fulton County clerk office said those are not correct, legitimate documents, they are fictitious, there is no indictment. Fastforward to immediate night and the indictment is remarkably similar if not identical to the document that surfaced today on the county website, it generated a lot of questions. How did that get up there, on a Government Website . Tonight when the District Attorney was asked about it, she said she had no comment, she is not a
Prosecutor to have communication with the clerks office. that is typically how things get scheduled and trials get scheduled and documents are sometimes filed. so there is nothing particularly unusual about that, but the question came down because there was a document that was on the clerk website, apparently, that lifted charges for the former president and it spelled out specific charges, saying he had been indicted for those defenses. we don t know if that was a draft, if that was erroneous lee sent from the d.a. s office, we don t know if it is a draft prepared from the clerks office, but we do know that you can t overstate how big a screw up it was because of what we just heard. it provides fodder and gasoline for the people who want to talk about that this is some kind of conspiracy, or the grand jury never even considered it that it was a done deal before it even happened. this document appeared, it was up for a little bit and then taken down. the problem is that some folks
Journalist, has she coordinated with jack smith, special counsel and she refused to comment on that. if i m house republicans, if i m james comer, jim jordan, i will want my hand on the communication to see if there is collusion between the two partieses, because that would be something very important going forward. house republicans and general public want to know on that. trace: julian, great to see you, i was asking if you felt fani willis achieved her goal of making people think, she s got the goods or not and secondly as garrett just pointed out, are you surprised when she asked about this document that showed up on the clerk website today, she never addressed it. said she is not an expert in clerk and they said the document