of the work actually needed, and leaseholders will also be given more time to sue builders over defective flats up to 30 years after construction. at the moment, it is six years. ultimately, the key question is who put that cladding up, who was responsible for the state of those buildings? they are the individuals, they are the companies who should pay in order to ensure that that cladding is removed and the buildings are safe. there will be no new money from the treasury for this and it is unclearjust how the government plans to pressure the industry to pay. developers often argue they met building regulations at the time and so should not have to bear these costs. the construction industry should pay its part in remediating buildings that are unsafe. but, of course, some of them won t. i hope the reputable companies will play their part. and some of them will have gone out of business so there is no one to pay. here in salford, the problems at lizzie s buildings are not cladding, a
ultimately, the key question is who put that cladding up, who was responsible for the state of those buildings? they are the individuals, they are the companies who should pay in order to ensure that that cladding is removed and the buildings are safe. there will be no new money from the treasury for this and it is unclearjust how the government plans to pressure the industry to pay. developers often argue they met building regulations at the time and so should not have to bear these costs. the construction industry should pay its part in remediating buildings that are unsafe. but, of course, some of them won t. i hope the reputable companies will play their part. and some of them will have gone out of business so there is no one to pay. here in salford, the problems at lizzie s buildings are not cladding, and she is still facing huge bills to fix other fire safety faults. this package does not help me