indictment. no one has made that allegation. at the end of the day, you have to weigh the damage of the indictment versus the damage of the allegations. it s just not even a fair way. senator marco rubio s evolution on donald trump s access to and handling of classified documents. yeah, i agree, it s not even a close call. you weigh whether you believe as the 11th circuit said that the foundational principle of this country, that no man is above the law, and you balance that against whatever marco was saying we should balance it against. and, you know, willie, i just you will notice you will notice of all of the noise out there, of all of the ground noise, nobody is saying he s innocent. nobody is saying he did not commit the crimes that will put him in jail for over a hundred years, if convicted on all things. i can t think of one person who has said this man did not do it. so what they say is what about hillary? i mean but they had a long time to do that.
prosecutors, jack smith s investigation of the documents continues right now. this is a special, live edition of the last word. the new york times is reporting tonight that the charges include willfully retaining national defense secrets and violations of the espionage act. making false statements, and an obstruction of justice conspiracy, according people familiar with the matter. donald trump has been ordered to surrender for arrest in processing an arraignment in the federal court in miami on tuesday at three pm. here s what donald trump s lawyer said on television tonight. this is not biblically accurate, because i m not looking at a charging document, i m looking at a summary sheet. so there is language in here that might be reflecting a single, counted set of two. but i think there was a conspiracy count as well. so that means that there could be other indictments. have you been told that anyone else is indicted here? we went advised of anyone else being indicted.
here is what donald trump s criminal defense lawyer, james trusty, said on television tonight. this is not publicly accurate because i m not looking at a charging document, i am looking at a summary sheet. so there s ones that might actually be reflecting on single counts too. but i think there was a conspiracy count as well. that means that there could be other indictments, have you been told that anyone else is indicted here? we weren t in fisa of anyone else being indicted. and i have a theory that some of the outrageous misconduct has affected in some other case. potential target. but bottom line is all we know about is our client. donald trump has been ordered to surrender for arrest processing and arraignment in federal court in miami on tuesday at three pm. this is how we got to hear. four months after donald trump left the white house, the national archives sent a letter to the national archives on may 6th, 2021. asking politely for the return of documents tha
It will be hard after today for the media not to focus on it, there was a court hearing, a judge and deal rejected because of how outrageous it was and other ancillary investigations alongside this one. think about it, if biden had r next to the name, where would we be? it would be the dominant story and there would be documentaries about it. laura: they would have the chyrons already. just a few years ago, joe biden was climbing that donald trump had side business deals in ukraine. he was speculating on that, projecting what was going on with his own family because hunter biden was getting money from ukrainian interests, that is documented by the house actions. meanwhile, we are in a proxy war
Today for the media not to focus on it now there was a court hearing. now there was a judge. now there was a plea deal that was rejected because of how are you outrageous it was and other ancillary. think about it for a movement if the wind name had an r next to its name a republican where it would be on the story. dominant story. netflix documentaries about it already. laura: right. they ve would already have the chyrons and the special graphic packages done, senator. but, just back to policy, whether it s our policy in ukraine, or just a few years ago joe biden was claiming that donald trump had side business deals in ukraine. he was actually speculating on that a few years ago, projecting, perhaps, what was going on with his own family because hunter biden was getting a lot of money from ukrainian interest. that s documented by the house actions. so meanwhile, you know, we are obviously in a proxy war right now in ukraine.