a decade ago he released to the world our national security agency s secret wide ranging information gathering programs. officials suspect a similar situation in this case. an individual or multiple people on the inside rather than an outside hack. fox news can confirm at least 53 documents have been made public. some of that intelligence is very new and apparently has been on the internet for weeks. the leaked intel shows secret details on the war in ukraine and other allies including south korea and israel. white house national security spokesman john kirby. this is information that has no business in the public domain. it has no business if you don t mind me saying, on the pages of newspapers or on television. it is not intended for public consumption and it should not be out there. in order to protect this country every day the way we do, one of the things we have to protect is information. not only the information itself, but the manner in which we glean that informati
that was the option you d have walked. and that s whyd i walked at that point my understanding was you were handed an apology that they wanted you to read and i agree with you and is think it took a lot of courage to say no and walk. i i would not have read that either because you re entitledho to your opinion and the whole idea that you have a government agency that is hovering over you and monitoring you is the antithesis of free speech. all right. q one last question. is the artistue is the irony of the government agency five months later found in myum favor on a number of complaints and an ofcom rejected all ofil them and said it would haveng been a chillingem infringement on my free speech,n which it was. was very pleased about u that . we shouldn t have a regulator like that in the uk but they actually found my favor. lastst question has to dol with our bill maher and now i would never refer the queen as an old bag as he b did.e i would be more respectful. i dd say yes, ma am. no