as reckless, outrageous and undignified. that was from senatorjeff flake of arizona, who announced he would not seek re election and would not remain silent or complicit. earlier, another senator, bob corker, described president trump as an utterly untruthful president. he is also not seeking re election next year. andrew plant reports. arriving at a lunch with senior republicans, tax issues on the menu, but criticism from inside his party already being served. reporter: mr president, any comment on. arizona senator, jeff flake, announcing he will not seek re election, accusing the president of a flagrant disregard for truth and decency. reckless, outrageous, and undignified behaviour has been misdiagnosed as telling it like it is when it is just reckless, outrageous, and undignified. and when such behaviour emanates from the top of our government, it is something else, it is dangerous to democracy. president trump has previously described senatorjeff flake as toxic. th
priority because you are not likely to get to the third. uc obama facing that now with climate change, the fiscal deal, emigration, etc.. the issue is not whether he supports those, what is he willing to go to the mat for? i think what we face and the standing committee may be people in favor of reform but we do not have a clue as to whether they are prepared to go to the mat for the same reforms and whether they can reach agreement on tough decisions with an agreed upon priority for those decisions. the candidates who did to their hands as to what changes they would like to see did not make it on to the standing committee. they fixed it ties they do not get you far in anticipating substantive positions and priorities. that does not necessarily get you to there. but the substantive positions and priorities are important for anticipating what the anticipation future is going to hold. substantively, serious reform is a very complicated matter. much more complicated in china
my former colleague says marriage is two things a standard form contract that establishes certain kinds of liberal basic rights but also a sanctification. constituting form. she argues in liberal state has no business sanctifying relationships and that will be ought to be doing is be establishing, dis-establishing marriages altogether. do you see that 20 years and now when you give this talk will not even use the word marriage? it depends a william e. my liberal. if you are a libertarian liberal, as the cato institute is, they would say yes. if you are more of the state should create conditions for human flourishing, the answer is not simple. here is what i will say more broadly. one of the easy mistakes of the whole debate is an over investment in lesbian and gay people on marriage and family lot generally. most people who are in relationships are in relationships between different sexes. there are millions of them. they re wonderful. they produced a bolt of children. wh
KENINGAU: The State Education Department (JPNS) always welcomes motivation and cooperation from the state’s schools, said JPNS Chief Assistant Director of Students Affairs, Student Development Sector Fazilah Haji Abdul Rahman.
New study reveals phonon properties of β-MoB₂ single crystal phys.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from phys.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.