just because i just said that small sequence of sentences, all the gun people are now going to write me really pedantic misspelled threatening letters telling me that i ve explained this in a way that they do not like. i welcome your hate mail. bring it on. but frankly the bottom line truth for most americans is that for 87 freaking years now u.s. law says you can t have a sawed-off shotgun. you cannot shorten the barrel of your shotgun to be 18 inches or less. because crime. but this being the united states of america, in which we are not really allowed to have rationally derived public policy about guns, even though sawed-off shotguns have been illegal in this country for almost 90 years, some genius has nevertheless invented, marketed and now legally sells in the united states, i kid you not, a shotgun revolver. it s a handgun, a huge oversized handgun, a huge oversized revolver with a giant oversized cylinder big enough to take shotgun shells. so you can t have a sawed-of
really pedantic misspelled threatening letters telling me that i ve explained this in a way that they do not like. i welcome your hate mail. bring it on. but frankly, the bottom line truth for most americans is that for 87 years now, u.s. law says you cannot have a sawed off shotgun. you cannot shorten the bear of your shotgun to be 18 inches or less, because, crime. but this being the united states of america in which we are not really a route to have nationally derive policies about guns, even though sawed off shotguns have been illegal in this country for almost 90 years, some genius has nevertheless, invented, marketed, and now legally cells in the united states a shotgun revolver. it is a handgun, a huge oversized handgun, a huge oversized revolver. with a giant oversized cylinder big enough to take shotgun cells. so, you kind of assault of shotgun in this country with a barrel of 18 inches, but you can have a shotgun revolver with a barrel length of two and a half inche
rationally derived public policy about guns, even though sawed-off shotguns have been illegal in this country for almost 90 years, some genius has nevertheless invented, marketed, and now legally sells in the united states, i kid you not, a shotgun revolver. it s a handgun, a huge oversized handgun, a huge oversized revolver with a giant oversized cylinder big enough to take shotgun shells. so you can t have a sawed-off shotgun in this country with a barrel shorter than 18 inches, but for some reason you can have a shotgun revolver with a barrel length of 2 1/2 inches, which, yes, does lead instantly to lots of 2 1/2-inch barrel jokes about the kinds of guys who want to buy this kind of cartoon laughingstock. overcompensating small-man gun. but it is a handgun. it is a sort of pitifully tumescent ridiculous cantaloupe of a handgun into which you really can load shotgun shells, or very large-sized bullets. and on january 6th this year h prosecutors now say that a 56-year-old m
on trial this week, the american justice system. several key cases showing bias in and out of the courtroom. in georgia, a defense attorney asking to ban black pastors from praying with the arbury attorneys. we don t want any other black pastors, jesse jackson or whoever it was, sitting in here with the family. and then a judge making a joke about asian judge. and then saying they couldn t use the worth victims but could use rioters, looters or arsonists. all of this as the gop with such rhetoric its members are receiving unrest. and paul gosar showing a video appearing to kill alexandria ocasio cortez. there has been deafening silence from the gop. that s because president trump is setting the precedent listen to this recording. but the law is coming for trump and his associates showing how the justice sis system is meant to work. steve bannon is to turn himself in monday. if convicted, he could be jailed. mark meadows could be next as he failed to testify before t
officially been made by msnbc. it has. i m sure someone can pass that message along to steve. we ll do so on tv here, just to be safe. thank you, my friend, much appreciated. and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. 25 years ago, in 1996, a lawsuit was filed in great britain. it was a libel lawsuit filed against an historian and her publisher. deborah lipstadt is a renowned historian, her field of study is anti-semitism. a few years before this lawsuit was filed, she had in fact published a book on anti-semitism. it was specifically about this weirdly accelerating phenomenon on the far right where people were denying that the holocaust had ever happened, denying that the nazis had actually killed millions of jewish people during world war ii. she wrote a seminal book about that. and one of the most prominent promoters of that myth, a guy who tried not to look the part, he didn t just stomp around with a shaved head and jackboots giving nazi salutes. he wasn t t