I was out due to the shutdown for the first, for the last month, but its good to be back. I direct the policy program here which has partnered for the last gosh, eight, nine years with the National History center in organizing and in cosponsoring this seminar. Delighted to do this as always, cochair the session always with my cochair eric arnesen from George Washington university. Let me just do a couple of the luminaries, the regulars among you will know that we would like to thank our staff, the people who are actually doing the heavy lifting in terms of getting the word out and getting us organized. Amanda perry, assistant director at the National History center. Im not sure if amand is here. Who i want to know what you think we should all give a round of applause. She is leaving after a very successful tenure at the National History center, moving on to bigger and better things. Her place will be taken by jeffrey rieger. Next to her we welcome to this endeavor. Amanda, thank you fo
winning the state on his way to securing the party nomination. bill clinton then defeated george h.w. bush in the general election. this program is about one hour. we welcome you to the post. we are glad to have you. we wish you luck on tuesday. is there anything you want to save us before we go to court say to us before we go to questions? temperament, experience, commitment, i find myself in this presidential campaign, offering what i believe to be foronly viable alternative 1992 to restore stability to this country. it is the premise of my case that the governing elite is stuck. it is paralyzed. it can t take the necessary corrective action to restore vitality to this country. the level of despair and suffering and injustice has no historic precedent in history of our nation. folks in washington are acting as though there are some problems out there that it is pretty much business as usual. 1992.terpretations of one is there are some problems that ought to be corrected
go governor won contests in vermont and connecticut heading into new york and needed another victory to continue momentum against democratic front-runner bill clinton. but jerry brown finished third in new york with governor clinton winning the state on his way to securing the party nomination. bill clinton then defeated incumbent george h.w. bush in the general election. this program is about one hour. we welcome you to the post. we are glad to have you. we wish you luck on tuesday. is there anything you want to say to us before we go to questions? by temperament, experience, commitment, i find myself in this presidential campaign, offering what i believe to be the only viable alternative for 1992 to restore stability to this country. it is the premise of my case that the governing elite is stuck. it is paralyzed. it can t take the necessary corrective action to restore vitality to this country. the level of despair and suffering and injustice has no historic precedent i
is there anything you want to say? sometimes it is worth letting you take three minutes to tell us what you want us to hear. brown: i temper myself with commitment. i find myself in this commitment being the only viable alternative for 1992 to restore stability to this country. it is the premise of my case that the governing elite is stuck. it is paralyzed. it can t take the necessary corrective action to restore vitality to this country. the level of despair and suffering and injustice has no historic precedent in history of our nation. folks in washington are acting as though there are some problems out there that it is pretty much business as usual. two interpretations of 1992. one is there are some problems that ought to be corrected. there is another view, there is something profoundly wrong with what is going on in the politics and governing processes of this nation. i take the second view. i believe the social fabric is unraveling. that the central state is aggregating
that the governing elite is stuck. it is paralyzed. it can t take the necessary corrective action to restore vitality to this country. the level of despair and suffering and injustice has no historic president precedent in the history of our nation. folks in washington are acting as though there are some problems out there, but it is pretty much business as usual. two interpretations of 1992. one is there are some problems that ought to be corrected. but things are pretty much on track. there is another view, there is something profoundly wrong with what is going on in the politics and governing processes of this nation. i take the second view. i believe the social fabric is unraveling. that the central state is aggregating to itself authority that would shock and dismay our founders. that civil liberties are being eroded. that injustice is the experience of millions and millions of americans in a way that is absolutely intolerable. when i see millions of kids who do not ha