rep. stefanik: the subcommittee will come to order. welcome to this joint hearing of the armed services subcommittee on emerging threats and capabilities, with the homeland security subcommittee on cyber security and infrastructure protection. today, we will examine inter-agency cyber cooperation and the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the department of homeland security, and the department of defense. holding this joint hearing has been a priority for this subcommittee for the past few months. and we are pleased that it has come together today. this is a timely opportunity to hear about recent inter-agency coordination efforts, and the status of related fy 2019, ndaa provisions. this is a critically important topic that will shape our oversight going forward, as we consider the long-term policy frameworks needed for the united states cyber enterprise. our committee and etc in particular, has performed significant oversight of the cyber organization, operations, a
islands will investigate the trump administration. and the president of the congressional management foundation, brad fitch, on their role in coaching new members of congress and their staffs. host: in election related news, utah s republican representative, who is losing by a thin margin has filed a lawsuit asking to stop the vote count so her campaign can issue challenges if they dispute the validity of mail-in ballots. eight house races, senate races in florida and mississippi and two in florida and georgia have yet to be called. this is the washington journal for november 15. our first hour directed at republicans. we want to hear from you on the lessons learned since the 2018 midterms. you can talk about the loss of the house and the reasons why and if you think there are other factors that contributed to that. what happened during the 2018 midterms as far as results and what are the lessons to take away as you go to 2020? 202-748-8000 if you live in the eastern and
i m alex pollack of the r street institute, and here s the book, in case you haven t bought one yet. i [applause] if. [laughter] i have the pleasure of reminding you that it is for sale tonight. as we think about the main question this book poses, how in the world are we as a society and as a government going to control the ever-increasing power of the administrative state or the unelected bureaucracy? if the bureaucracy assumes for itself what, in fact, are legislative powers, who or what can restrain them? as peter writes, in many instances administrative agencies appear to have issued rules or interpreted their authority in ways that exceeded the powers they were given by congress, but the courts have not intervened. should the courts be intervening to correct this overreach of bureaucratic will to power? yes, says peter, quoting chief justice john roberts. it is the obligation of the judiciary not only to confine itself to its proper role, but to insure that the other
saturday at 10:00 p.m. eastern on american history tv on c-span3. following the 100th anniversary of the end of world war i, the brookings institution hosted a discussion to look at the u.s. role in the world. it runs about an hour and a half. thank you, john. thank you to all of you in the consequence for coming and for all of us joining on webcast. so, i m delighted to moderate this panel discussion today with adam and bob on the topic of the world war i armistice day, what it means for today, but also what followed world war i, that 20-year period that led to the collapse of world order and world war ii and the role of american leadership and both adam and bob have written really fascinating books on this topic. and so we d like to look at those lessons but also take it to today, what it means for the role of europe today, for american leadership, for u.s.-china, but i think it would only be appropriate were we to start with the history, and so bob, if i could maybe s
severe harm and suffering from the time they begin to gain venus access all the way through his eventual death. mr. hockman, can you tell me the current condition of your client in light of footnote of your opening brief and in particular, but not exclusively? does he still have a trach in his throat? if he does, doesn t that moot out certain of your claims, particularly i thought much of the prep work and dangers related to him choking on his own blood, doesn t the trach minimize that now? the first answer to your question, you know we ve requested leave to lodge the medical records from the summer. i m happy to answer. it s obviously outside the record. i want to make that clear. right now, as far as into know, he still has a trach in. there is no indication about how long he s going to continue to have the trach. the trach could be removed at any time that medical people determine it s appropriate to do so. i don t think it can moot out the case because without if