comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Central hudson gas electric corporation - Page 4 : comparemela.com

What This Supreme Court Ruling Means for the Washington Redskins, Other Brands Deemed 'Offensive'

Should “offensive” brand names be allowed to get a federal trademark? The Supreme Court answered “yes” on Monday, handing a decisive win to Simon Tam and his band, The Slants. Tam had tried to register a trademark for his band’s name, but the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied his application, citing a provision of the federal law known as the Lanham Act.

United-states
Washington
New-york
Americans
Justice-neil-gorsuch
Justice-samuel-alito
Ruth-bader-ginsburg
Tiffany-bates
Justice-anthony-kennedy
Elena-kagan
Simon-tam
Elizabeth-slattery

Potential First Amendment Defenses to a Dark Patterns Claim | Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Courts and the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) have not yet addressed whether and to what degree the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution may protect advertising techniques.

Rhode-island
United-states
California
San-fernando-valley
Stephen-newman
Stroock-dec
Tarunesh-mathur
Google
Council-of-san-fernando-valley
Epic-games
Roommates-com
Communications-decency

Vermont Lawsuit a Test Case for GMO-Labeling Laws and the First Amendment

On May 8, 2014, Governor Peter Shumlin of Vermont signed Act 120 into law.[1] This law will become enforceable on July 1, 2016, and is one of the country’s first mandatory-labeling laws for genetically modified organisms (GMOs).[2] Connecticut and Maine also have passed GMO-labeling laws, and similar bills have been introduced in many other state legislatures.[3]

New-york
United-states
Maine
Ohio
Vermont
Connecticut
American
Peter-shumlin
Tom-vilsack
United-states-court
Public-service-commission
Macintosh

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.