Is a tough place. i cannot speak to this particular reporter that with those policy changes they are a privatem company i m not sure on what grounds they have to litigate youtube this is the first amendment right when he signed up they signed a user agreement. and what about those censorship standards quick. you sign a user agreement that you limit are what type of videos you put out and what is offensive or not offensive it is the same as when blockbuster was the largest distributor that i have to carry every single movie
i can t speak to this particular reporter and what he s alleging or not alleging, but youtube s policy change is something that youtube is allowed to do. they re a private company. i m not t really sure on what grounds conservatives would have to litigate youtube. remember, they re a private company. this is theirti first amendment right. when crowder signed up to be a youtubeer, he signed, just like i did jesse: what if they re applying their censorship standards unevenly based on politics? well, no, no youtube, when you sign up, you sign a user agreement. and they say they can limit how, what type of video they put up and what they deem to be offensive and non-offensive, and that is their first amendment right as a company. it s the same as when blockbuster was the largest distributer of rental videos. they don t have to carry every single video ever produced, just like when barnes & noble was the number one bookstore in the country jesse: yeah, richard, there s a lot of yo