itself. does it charge what they think it charges? is it survivable on its face? are there errors, problems, do we need more information to defend it? and i think there has been discussion about this scheduling order of, you know, could this case go to trial in march. we would be able to have motions that will go into march before you ever get to reviewing evidence on a case this size. so what s the next legal move? he has indicated he tried to move it to a federal court out of a state court. is that still his plan? i don t have information on what the strategy is going to be, as far as whether there will be removal or not. that may be one of many different points of attack. i don t know where tler going with that yet. are you being compensated by mr. giuliani for your work? i don t want to get into any attorney-client privilege or discussions about things that my client and i have discussed. the reason i ask is because our reporting here and his own other attorney in a diffe
time. third time is not a charm as it were here. an attorney for rudy giuliani, brian tevis, was on cnn last night. listen to what he had to say about their defense and the timeline of a trial. it s very premature to be saying what is the defense going to be. i mean, you look at this indictment, it s very complex. racketeering in and of itself, rico indictments are very broad. they re very general. they leave themselves open to a lot of attacks to be made on the document itself. there s been some discussion about this scheduling order of could this case go to trial in march. we would be able to have motions that will go into march before you ever get to reviewing evidence on a case this size. so what does that tell you about what the realistic timeline is going to be for these other cases? yeah, i think what that attorney for rudy giuliani just said is completely consistent with what i said before. he s saying we re not even forget about getting through the millions of pages