questions. but we begin with one very compelling congressional event. gold star families demanding answers from the biden administration after and their loved ones were killed during the chaotic brawl in afgha afghanistan. the chief correspondent, jonathan hunt, is live with what happen. good evening. jonathan: good evening. the family of those who died, that terrible day in kabul, 711 days ago, have been searching for answers ever since. they want to know how did that happen? why did it happen. they feel the biden administration has failed to take responsibility for mistakes that allowed a suicide bomber to get close enough to marines and other service members regarding the airport. instead, they say, their loved ones have been forgotten by the administration. our leaders, including the secretary of defense and our commander-in-chief, called this evacuation a success, as if there should be celebration. it is like a knife in the heart for our families, our lives, given in
former president donald trump. house democrats sent a letter to judicial conference in effort to rewrite federal standard. democrats claim televising the trial will be beneficial. the letter was spearheaded by california senate hopeful adam schiff, who wrote, given historic nature of the charges brought forth in cases, it is hard to imagine more powerful circumstance for televised proceedings. it will be vitally important for the public to witness how the trials are conducted. the credibility of witnesses. critics slammed the move as a partisan slump, trump s officials invite the idea. i would love to see that, i m convinced biden administration doesn t want people to see the truth. they want to keep important information about this case from the press. emily: wall street journal argues cameras should stay far away from the courtroom, cameras can be distraction from seeking fair justice, particular risk in trump trial that will be a global media circus in any case, that
the primary campaign in the election season. unlike we have ever seen before. good evening, everybody, i m martha mccallum. bret: i m bret baier. it is super tuesday. the most states, the most delegates. the most votes on the line as both parties march towards a 2020 rematch it looks like. at this hour polls are closed in virginia and vermont. vermont could be nikki haley s best chance to win a state tonight, thanks to moderate northeast republican voters and an open primary system. martha: virginia is also holding an open primary and she could do well in the suburban areas near d.c. both states also host democratic presidential primaries tonight where biden is widely expected to win. bret: those are just the first prizes of the night. 16 states and one territory heading to the polls today, including the two biggest states, texas and california. a lot of delegates there. martha: indeed, on the republican side there are 854 delegates up for grabs tonight. that is more
this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. we are hours two hours away from what we hope is president biden s last state of the union address. larry kudlow is in the house, vivek ramaswamy, and so many more. first, spinning themselves dizzy, that is the focus of tonight s angle state of the union, state of the union speeches rarely memorable no. real evidence that they help turn things down for flailing presidencies. nonetheless brian s advisers are doing their best to propose ideas. i think the top line should be the inflation reduction act reduced inflation. good policy makes good politics, right? and he has good policy. jobs, wages, everything going in the right direction economically. the stock market is booming. blockbuster job report after blockbuster job report. i don t think you guys need me. i was just listening to the commentary. [laughter] i don t think you guys need me this morning. laura: of course kjp is right. although i might add that they
lawyers will make on the stand. here is jonna lauro on meet the press. the defense is quite simple. donald trump, president trump, believed in his heart of hearts that he had won that election. and as any american citizen, he had a right to speak out under the first amendment. he had a right to petition governments around the country, state governments. based on his grievances that election irregularities had occurred. he had every right to speak about the important issues that were taking place after the election. a technical violation of the constitution is not a violation of criminal law. that is just plain wrong. except a technical violation of the constitution by definition is still a violation of the constitution. the constitution, in six different places, opposes insurrection and our constitution is designed to stop people from trying to overthrow elections, and trying to overthrow the government. moments later, democratic congressman jamie raskin responded to laur