Alone, for him to espouse this is disqualifying for the offense. dick about what they re saying. they re saying that joe biden and his chief of staff, jeff science, canter out the election next november and install themselves for a second term. it s ridiculous. yeah, they are saying that president biden and the white house chief of staff now can basically commit any crime they want. this really is the nixon doctrine that nixon did not there enunciate on top after he was pardoned. exactly, normally, they only voice this when they have absolute immunity, with the next guy s power. it s not the case. i think back to what donald trump is saying and what he thinks joe biden s powers are. now it s just constitutionally absurd. the other question about mark meadows and what he said about the standing order to declassify, i don t think that s all that surprising lawrence. we talked about this before. the idea that the president had
The federal law or constitutional provision that makes in the very awful election part of the job at the white house. it is ridiculous. meadows was acting as some protector of election integrity. he was acting to protect his boss and tried to get the results don t out. and that way, he is similar to nixon s chief of staff. it s not just meadows. trump today was tweeting basically that he has absolute immunity according to some constitutional scholar, which is probably ridiculous. alone, for him to espouse this is disqualifying for the offense. dick about what they re saying. they re saying that joe biden and his chief of staff, jeff science, canter out the election next november and install themselves for a second term. it s ridiculous. yeah, they are saying that president biden and the white house chief of staff now can basically commit any crime they want. this really is the nixon