Ban. Yeah, absolutely. Allows abortions if situations where patients are failing not close enough to say that its necessary to prevent death. And that means that these patients are left in that gap. Meghan mentioned. And i mean, just ask the obvious question here. This world did not exist before roe was overturned. Absolutely. Right. Part of the challenges, the meaning of the statute, this federal statute that protects people in emergencies. And idaho is trying to say that this is a new problem that the federal government is is creating the rules. But in fact, this has always been the treatment for abortions or sometimes the treatment for these kinds of conditions. Its just that it wasnt banned before. Dobbs has changed the landscape. Its not that emtala has changed. Its that emtala plays out differently. Now the dobbs allows abortions to be bound with very strict are no exceptions for health. Ryan follow dobbs who was supposed to the intent of dobbs of send it back to the states. And
more now on the challenges facing arizona s immigration crackdown. a sheriff in one of the state s biggest counties is opening defying governor jan brewer s executive orders refusing to let the officers enforce the law. when this case goes to the supreme court which eventually it s going to line up, you re going to find there are two major legal issues with this particular law. one of them the state cannot preempt in the area of immigration. and two, reasonable suspicion is constitutionally vague. can any legal challenge at the state or federal level hold up? joining us now cnn s senior analyst jeffrey toobin and mark smith. good evening, good to see you both here. you heard what the mayor had to say, jeff, do you think he s got a case here? i think he s got a good chance. this is a very political case.