myers is a city were great on the show, you are just great in the show. i can t wait to see. that i did my best. i tried to live up to the high standards of nbc. when i was in elementary school, if you can t see anything else but, sometimes a neonatal. i ve disappointed the sisters of st. joseph in many ways. and last night i hope none of them are watching because i wasn t mean to george santos. but it s low hanging fruit, lawrence. it s hard to be dismissive of george santos. saying he has literally light about everything in his life. this makes me feel better, i know for a fact that george santos was not watching the show last night. i know i didn t personally heard is feeling. how do you know that lawrence? it s funny should ask, we have video which we are going to show of exactly who george santos out of the town in washington d.c. at 10:10 pm. exactly when i was saying things about my depart s feelings. i m very eager to know what george santos was doin
there can be someone in the party in congress who gives a kind of unfair impression of that party. anthony winner for example. the speaker of the house in that case nancy pelosi, as soon as enough pictures of anthony weiner appeared online called him in the office and said get out of here. there were no hearings in the ethics committee. there is no process. resign he. resigned within 24 hours. that s the kind of power that kevin mccarthy cannot exercise. anthony winner did not represent anyone else in the house of representatives. that s one reason why nancy pelosi needed him out of there and i don t want any more sentences with his name on. george santos may be a good representative of republicanism in the house of representatives. it s a level of integrity that
i thought i would ask if you heard anything on the hill? the contempt vote on holder is going to be in the house on thursday. and congressman issa is doing his whes to whip this up, even though he admitted on fox he has no everyday of a coverup? it s a presumption of guilt with a recognition of innocence. they acknowledge they have no evidence that shows that the administration was involved in this, but they re searching for evidence that it was there. the thing they re willfully ignoring or seems they re ignoring is that the attorney general cannot exercise the right of executive privilege. he must request that right from the president himself. and so when the president exercised that right, it was part of the process. it wasn t some sort of malicious or sinister attempt to cover it up, at least according to the white house. that s an important thing to actually know when you re looking at this because there s no way to exercise executive privilege without bringing the
Heard anything on the hill? the contempt vote on holder is going to be in the house on thursday. and congressman issa is doing his best to whip this up, even though he admitted on fox he has no everyday of a coverup? it s a presumption of guilt with a recognition of innocence. they acknowledge they have no evidence that shows that the administration was involved in this, but they re searching for evidence that it was there. the thing they re willfully ignoring or seems they re ignoring is that the attorney general cannot exercise the right of executive privilege. he must request that right from the president himself. and so when the president exercised that right, it was part of the process. it wasn t some sort of malicious or sinister attempt to cover it up, at least according to the white house. that s an important thing to actually know when you re looking at this because there s no way to exercise executive privilege without bringing the president into the matter, to then turn ar
I mean. impeachment, did you mention? i thought i would ask if you heard anything on the hill? the contempt vote on holder is going to be in the house on thursday. and congressman issa is doing his whes to whip this up, even though he admitted on fox he has no everyday of a coverup? it s a presumption of guilt with a recognition of innocence. they acknowledge they have no evidence that shows that the administration was involved in this, but they re searching for evidence that it was there. the thing they re willfully ignoring or seems they re ignoring is that the attorney general cannot exercise the right of executive privilege. he must request that right from the president himself. and so when the president exercised that right, it was part of the process. it wasn t some sort of malicious or sinister attempt to cover it up, at least according to the white house. that s an important thing to actually know when you re looking at this because there s no way to exercise executive