Declaration of independence, abraham lincolns top hat from his fatal night at fords theater, and jaclyn kenny with her new born son taken in 1960. Tucker is up next. Tucker good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight. For months youve watched politicians and journalists assert with confidence that last novembers election was in fact a sham. He was not a wakeup call to the political people, it was not a cry for help from the crumbling barn harlan, it wasnt a sign that the ruling class is corrupt or the government was need of reform. It was none of that. It was a fluke engineered by the russian government because they are evil and they hate our values. So far there is not been much proof that any of this actually happened or any proof at all, but we did loon tunick learned tonight that the President Trump sat with blood where prudent at
dinner, but any case all of this russian narrative has changed the rules here in washington maybe forever. The russians are now our chief enemy. A
i think that if you think deportation is the only penalty that should be upheld for eminence, i think that s wrong. that s never been the case in previous immigration waves. most of the time when we do have extraordinarily were too harsh penalties, it becomes an embarrassment of history. i think we have within the trump administration a very robust conversation going on, and the turnkey of that conversation is general kelley. general kelly is obviously someone who knows a lot about the immigration situation, especially in central america when he was commanding tucker: and i don t doubt any of that. but let s to the principle here really quickly. what you re saying is we have laws in the books, we should ignore. my question always is if you believe that, then why not make a sincere effort to change the law? i couldn t agree more. tucker: all the rich people, well-educated people are for ignoring immigration laws, all that i know. but i don t hear anybody announcing a campaigni
deportation is the only penalty that should be upheld for eminence, i think that s wrong. that s never been the case in previous immigration waves. most of the time when we do have extraordinarily were too harsh penalties, it becomes an embarrassment of history. i think we have within the trump administration a very robust conversation going on, and the turnkey of that conversation is general kelley. general kelly is obviously someone who knows a lot about the immigration situation, especially in central america when he was commanding tucker: and i don t doubt any of that. but let s to the principle here really quickly. what you re saying is we have laws in the books, we should ignore. my question always is if you believe that, then why not make a sincere effort to change the law? i couldn t agree more. tucker: all the rich people, well-educated people are for ignoring immigration laws, all that i know. but i don t hear anybody announcing a campaigning congress to change the la