Have been made public. yeah. so, in addition to a voting rights lawyer, i m actually owe so a campaign finance lawyer. and i can tell you that what you described is, i think, actually, potentially quite a bit worse. at its best, at its best, for the legal position of fox, it was handing off bidens ads before they were public. now, that would violate the campaign finance laws. but what i suspect it is, when you read the language, chris, and you can go back and read it carefully now, it sounds like fox had information that they were providing. so i suspect what was actually happening is that fox knew not just the content of the ads, but for example, what demand was for different points. what rates might change for buying in some time. what the analytics of the networks are. people don t realize, but msnbc s got a trove of information about how different ads are reacting at different times of the day, my different advertisers hit different segments of voters, who is tuning in who s not,
His company. and that actually does raise questions. about whether the money was his. was it from the corporation? was a corporate money? depending on how that corporation is taxed as an llc. that might be in impermissible corporate contribution. there are questions. experts have raised about. that also about well, what if the money was given to him by other donors. to sort of sidestep the limits on how much he can give to a candidate. we really do not know the answers to those questions. but now it appears that the campaign treasurer might not herself be willing to say if she knows the answer either. okay, what is the campaign let s just establish this, it looks on the fcc imports that needed flowing. now we have an amended filings say that well, it wasn t personal alarms. the question is where did the money come from? i m not a campaign finance lawyer. one thing i do note is that it s flatly illegal to get a donor to give you have a male
Been anything fleshed out or real or actually confirmed, tips, random stories, things about golf. it was this pile about donald trump and we know he likes control. clearly, you can see from this grab bag of stuff, david pecker had been at ami for a really long time. this was pretty clear from the audio and our reporting this was not some plan michael cohen dreamed up, he said this in court, what he was told to do by donald trump is go deal with this, so he was going and dealing with this. in the court papers, there is a reference to the candidate, he s not named. there are clear references on that tape to alan weisselberg, who was given immunity to testify to this. they have connection to this. where this leads, i don t know, i m not a campaign finance lawyer. it is possible the president is saying i was buying these things for years and had nothing to do with the election and becomes
There are clear references on that tape to alan weisselberg, who was given immunity to testify to this. they have connection to this. where this leads, i don t know, i m not a campaign finance lawyer. it is possible the president is saying i was buying these things for years and had nothing to do with the election and becomes more complicated with the election. you and david pecker have information on a long relationship. there is information, it could be a part of it. david pecker, american media actually published an in-house magazine for the trump hotels. they were business partners with trump in certain ventures, that s how close they were. what i thought was so fascinating about maggie s story was how, as long as david pecker was there, everything was going to be fine. they could keep that certainly is what pecker said to me in very explicit terms, we
Weeks, we ve reported that mcgahn had extensive series of interviews with special counsel robert mueller and did not provide trump s lawyers with a full debriefing of what he discussed in those interviews. i can tell you mcgahn was a long-time republican campaign finance lawyer. he served at one point on the federal election commission. he is playing an important role in confirming a series of concerted judges to the bench. this is something that trump has hailed and his supporters have hailed among his accomplishments in these 31st couple of years in office. this is important news, now the president confirming what we have been reporting and what was reported earlier this morning. erica. as we re looking at this, too, saying we would imagine for some consistency, programs, for that short period of time, as we are dealing with the fresh appointment of brett kavanaugh?