Settled on. well, i only need 11,750 votes and that is not taken n in context what that call waots about. so my question to you is, you know, what did he do here? or is this an example that you you might have a legal theory, maybe it s deemed controversial? is it a legitimate theoreoryy, especially in light of, you know, let s sa of y what happened in 1960 with john kennedy in hawaii and alternate electors haw chosen? i think this is criminalizing the challenging of elections. basically, you have a democratic prosecutor saying, how dare challenge a democratich victory? well, it s been done beforallene by democrats. and the whole case is based on this theory that donald trump really didn t mean it. well , neither did, though. even if that were true and,fw you know, as democrats, they challenged trump s trump election on no grounds at all. o i meann no, many of these past l challenges were very, very