they are really not getting anywhere above waist height. that really puts emphasis on how we have to conserve our mature forests because this plantation here is going to probably take maybe 20, 30 years to really have an impact. it s been estimated that to reduce co2 by a billion tons, you d need a new forest twice the size of california. but together, could technology and nature suck up the c02 mess we re currently making? if we look at planting trees or afforestation, then the feeling was that that could remove something of the order of about 3 billion tons of carbon dioxide by mid century. and with carbon capture and storage which, if done right, could also be a net carbon removal technology, that might contribute something like 2 billion tons of carbon dioxide removal by mid century. and then direct air capture, something like three, may be as high as 5, billion tons by mid century. now, if you add all of those up, you are talking about 10
amount of tree species within a forest, so the more biodiverse we have in terms of what s above the ground, the more biodiverse is below the ground and the more carbon ends up in the soil, where it is stored for a very, very long time. so does he think nature alone could lead us to carbon neutrality? this is a recent plantation. there s around about 15 20 different shrub and tree species and this was planted last year, in the last winter, which is a year ago for us now but, as you can see, they are really not getting anywhere above waist height. that really puts emphasis on how we have to conserve our mature forests because this plantation here is going to probably take maybe 20, 30 years to really have an impact. it s been estimated that to reduce co2 by a billion tons, you d need a new forest twice the size of california. but together, could technology and nature suck up the c02 mess we re currently making?
so does he think nature alone could lead us to carbon neutrality? this is a recent plantation. there s around about 15 20 different shrub and tree species and this was planted last year, in the last winter, which is a year ago for us now but, as you can see, they are really not getting anywhere above waist height. that really puts emphasis on how we have to conserve our mature forests because this plantation here is going to probably take maybe 20, 30 years to really have an impact. it s been estimated that to reduce co2 by a billion tons, you d need a new forest twice the size of california. but together, could technology and nature suck up the c02 mess we re currently making? if we look at planting trees or afforestation, then the feeling was that that could remove something of the order of about 3 billion tons of carbon dioxide by mid century.
the more biodiverse is below the ground and the more carbon ends up in the soil, where it is stored for a very, very long time. so does he think nature alone could lead us to carbon neutrality? this is a recent plantation. there s around about 15 20 different shrub and tree species and this was planted last year, in the last winter, which is a year ago for us now but, as you can see, they are really not getting anywhere above waist height. that really puts emphasis on how we have to conserve our mature forests because this plantation here is going to probably take maybe 20, 30 years to really have an impact. it s been estimated that to reduce co2 by a billion tons, you d need a new forest twice the size of california. but together, could technology and nature suck up the c02 mess we re currently making?
years to really have an impact. it s been estimated that to reduce co2 by a billion tons, you d need a new forest twice the size of california. but together, could technology and nature suck up the c02 mess we re currently making? if we look at planting trees or afforestation, then the feeling was that that could remove something of the order of about 3 billion tons of carbon dioxide by mid century. and with carbon capture and storage which, if done right, could also be a net carbon removal technology, that might contribute something like 2 billion tons of carbon dioxide removal by mid century. and then direct air capture, something like three, may be as high as five, billion tons by mid century. now, if you add all of those up, you are talking about io billion tons of c02 removal by mid century. that might seem like a lot but comparing it to our current emissions, which are 35 billion tons of c02, it only represents about a third of the solution. and so that means to deal