Announced some steps this week to try to improve things, you know, ramping up imports from abroad and also expanding buying options for people who are paying with wic benefits. but the white house says they ve been working on this for months and critics are now saying that they should have done something sooner before parents are going to the stores and having to hit multiple locations to find what they need. should the white house have taken more action sooner? we should have been dealing with this and other problems way in advance. you see capitolism calls for just in time delivery and minimum possible inventories, that s how you maximize profits. nobody s paying companies for resiliency and stockpiling. we saw what happened to toilet paper two years ago, that s less of a crisis than this, obviously. and so, you need a system where you re paying for stock piles and you re paying for surplus capacity. right now, i showed my colleagues a draft of a bill that would clarify the
That 10% that approves of congress, do you think those were staff? they were not paying attention when they answered the questions. you think of the investigation of bachus for buying options and betting on a broad decline after a closed door meeting with paulson and ben bernanke. how is that not mark is not going to like this. part of the reason for the investigations is the ethics draining of the swamp that pelosi put in place, where they decided getting serious about ethics investigations. i agree with that actually. you do? absolutely. you cannot have the ethics investigations toil away and she knew when she did it of course you ll catch republicans and democrats, and i ll say one more thing. pelosi recognized and the people