your d.v.r. and watch later today. john: hunter biden s long time business partner visited the white house at least eight times in 2016 alone, meeting with then vice president biden s chief of staff. combined with additional reporting from the new york post, a total of 27 white house meetings by biden business partner between the obama years of 2009 and 2016. that s a lot of meetings. john roberts in washington, sandra, good to have you back. sandra: developing story and we are watching it. sandra smith in new york. our new reporting comes as newly surfaced emails suggest joe biden paid for hunter s legal fees. part of a mega deal with a chinese company and even got a 10% cut. remember, president biden said many times he s never discussed foreign business dealings with his son. john: on capitol hill yesterday, attorney general garland refusing to give senators an update on the investigation into hunter biden as he faces more pressure to appoint a special counsel. mark m
the laws were introduced after the siege of the capital, onjanuary 6, which led to donald trump being removed from several social media networks. supporters of the law that it was necessary to prevent censorship of conservative users a long running concern among republicans. they argued they were simply trying to regulate business behaviour, not the speech of these firms. but opponents, including the industry group challenging both laws, net choice, said they infringed on the platforms first amendment rights, by limiting the content they can publish and warning that a ruling for the states would deal a blow to the online platforms biggest models, which rely on curation to attract users and advertisers. the supreme court is expected to issue its ruling injune in the crucial months ahead of the upcoming us presidential elections. in aviation news, a panel by the us government after questions democrat is in 2018 and 2019. boeing is reviewing the findings. in india s adani gr
led to former president donald trump being removed from several social media networks. supporters of the law argued it was necessary to prevent censorship of conservative users, a long running concern of republicans. they argue they are trying to regulate business behaviour, not the speech of these firms. but opponents, including the industry group challenging both laws, said they inflinged on the platform s own first amendment rights by limiting the content these companies can publish and warning that a ruling for the states would deal a blow for the online platforms business models, which rely on to attract users and advertisers. the supreme court is expected toissue the supreme court is expected to issue its ruling injune in the crucial months ahead of the upcoming us presidential election. in other news, microsoft has inked a new partnership with a french start up, part of the tech giant s strategy to expand its footprint in the artificial intelligence issue. it will giv
questioned aspects of legislation passed in florida and texas that limits what social media platforms can do to moderate content. fleury. they were proposed after the siege of the capital, which led to donald trump being removed from several social media networks. supporters of the law that it was necessary to prevent censorship of conservative users. a long running concern among republicans. they argued they were civilly trying to regulate business behaviour, not the speech of these firms. but opponents, including the industry group challenging both laws, net choice, said they infringed on the platforms first amendment rights, by limiting the content they can publish and warning that a ruling for the states would deal a blow to the online platforms biggest models, which rely on duration to attract users and advertisers. the supreme court is expected to issue its ruling injune in the crucial months ahead of the us presidential elections. serious concerns have been raised
of conservative users, a long running concern among republicans. they argued that they were simply trying to regulate business behaviour, not the speech of these firms. but opponents, including netchoice, which is the industry group challenging both laws, said they infringed on the platform s own first amendment rights by limiting the content these companies can publish and warning that a ruling for the states would deal a blow to the online platforms business models, which rely on curation to attract users and advertisers. the supreme court is expected to issue its ruling injune, in the crucial months ahead of the upcoming us presidential election. in other news, microsoft has inked a new partnership with french start up mistral ai. the deal is part of the tech giant s strategy to expand its footprint in the artificial intelligence industry. under the agreement, mistral s large language models will be available on microsoft s azure cloud computing platform and give microsof